Home Blog Page 200

Airplane Accidents Are Making People Re-Evaluate How They Fly With Infants

0


Three years later, Khadija Zaidi-Rashid still remembers the screams of other passengers, the unsettled expression on the flight attendant’s face and the helplessness she felt holding her infant on her lap.

Dr. Zaidi-Rashid, 34, then a doctoral student, was flying from Washington to Doha, Qatar, with her mother and two children when their airplane encountered severe turbulence. Her other child, a toddler, was in a seat next to her, and the half-hour of roller-coaster shaking and bucking felt like hours. Since then — though everyone emerged unscathed — she cannot get over the sense of worry on every flight she takes.

“The turbulence has caused me to feel claustrophobic, all kinds of motherhood-related anxiety,” she said, adding that she no longer sleeps during flights. She’s worried that her children, now older, will slip out of their seatbelts they are now required to have. She often keeps her hand on them as a precaution.

She’s not alone. In recent months, after a series of terrifying plane crashes and accidents on the tarmac, parents have swarmed online message boards and lit up group chats to unload their anxieties about upcoming flights and longstanding safety norms for family travel.

The accidents, which included a midair collision in Washington and a flipped-over plane in Toronto, have fueled concerns about whether young children on airplanes, particularly infants, are sufficiently protected. The worry has compelled some parents to rethink how they fly, with many considering options ranging from bringing car seats to canceling trips.

Holding your small child on your lap has been acceptable in air travel for decades. The practice, which airlines allow for travelers under 2 years old to fly free or at a steep discount, saves parents or caregivers airfare. Parents list convenience and their child’s comfort as other key motivators.

But the safety of the practice has been debated for decades.

Aviation safety agencies around the world have made their position clear: Children are safest in airplanes when they’re secured in their own seats in approved child restraint systems, such as car seats certified for airplane use.

“Your arms aren’t capable of holding your in-lap child securely, especially during unexpected turbulence,” the Federal Aviation Administration warns on its website. The European Union Aviation Safety Agency states that several studies have concluded that child safety seats provide “a level of safety equivalent to that provided to adult passengers.”

Pediatricians, flight attendants and academics agree. They emphasize the elevated risks of lap children becoming injured. They could be struck by the in-flight service carts or by objects falling from the luggage bins.

A 2019 study in the journal Pediatric Emergency Care found that of about 114,000 medical events that occurred on flights between 2009 and 2014, more than 12,000 included children. Of these, roughly 2,000 involved lap children, making them more than “twice as likely to sustain an in-flight injury compared with other in-flight medical events.”

But if parents want to use car seats or other safety equipment on board, the rules differ by airline (or even by the seat in the aircraft). What equipment is available also can vary. Some airplanes have bassinets, which can be requested but not guaranteed on the day of travel. Not all car seats fit on smaller planes. In Europe, infant seatbelts that secure a child to a parent are available, though they aren’t permitted in the United States and Canada because of concerns that a child’s abdomen could be severely injured by the seatbelt or the parent. There are even rules that infants cannot be worn in carriers during takeoff and landing, the most dangerous periods of a flight.

The official language from the F.A.A. about children flying in laps is only a warning, with no legal weight. Legislation even to authorize a new study of children’s safety while flying, introduced in Congress nearly two years ago, has stalled.

The lack of federal regulation about lap children gives parents “the wrong assumption that if it’s allowed it must be safe,” said Jan Brown, a former United Airlines flight attendant.

In 1989, Ms. Brown survived an airplane crash in Iowa in which 111 of 296 people on board, including passengers and crew, died. Flight attendants advised parents to place their children by their feet, the standard safety guidance at the time. There were four lap infants on the flight and one, a 23-month-old, died.

It is incredibly rare for any passenger to die in a commercial airplane accident, and aviation remains far safer than driving. This was the conclusion of a study on car seat use in airplanes conducted in 1994 by the F.A.A. The report maintained that while car seats were the safest place for children to be, requiring parents to purchase an extra seat would deter them from flying. Instead they’d resort to driving, a statistically more lethal form of transit.

However, there hasn’t been substantive research into whether a significant number of families would drive rather than fly because of the cost of buying a seat for their infant, said William McGee, a senior fellow at the American Economic Liberties Project, a nonprofit research and advocacy group.

“It should be noted that at no time has the F.A.A. actually studied its own theory,” he said. “Instead it has always just been assumed, without any statistical analysis, surveys, public comments or meaningful research, which runs contrary to federal government rule-making procedures.”

Lia Tuso, an expert in aviation child passenger safety, said that child safety remains a “deficiency in the airline industry.”

Airlines generally don’t note the safety risks of lap children on their websites, just that they are allowed.

Hannah Walden, a spokeswoman for the trade group Airlines for America, said in a statement that U.S. airlines “follow the guidance and regulations set by our safety regulator, the Federal Aviation Administration.”

But a palpable shift in the culture, Ms. Tuso said, may be occurring: Parents are becoming increasingly aware of the risks, using car seats and other alternatives more often on flights. They are increasingly crowdsourcing for guidance on equipment and best practices to avoid flying with their children on their laps.

Though there are plenty of rules for adults flying on airplanes, said Chelsea Nicholls, the mother of a 16-month-old child, it’s as if there are “no rules for the kids.”

Ms. Nicholls, 35, a marketing executive from New Canaan, Conn., previously believed flying with a car seat was unwieldy and impractical. Ahead of a recent flight to Florida, however, she purchased her daughter a seat and an F.A.A.-approved harness.

“I never felt like I was an anxious person,” she said. “You take your own safety for granted sometimes, but when you’re caring for a young child, so many thoughts start flooding your mind.”

Traveling to Florida, Ms. Nicholls said she felt “comfortable and safe” seeing her child strapped into her own seat, especially during the flight’s occasional bumps.

“It definitely let me relax a little bit,” she said.

Delaney and Jake Steele, of Vancouver, Wash., were on the Alaska Airlines flight in January 2024 with their daughter, Quinnette, when a door plug blew out of the cabin as the plane was ascending. They were sitting five rows back and on the opposite side of the gaping hole. Quinnette, then 9 months old, was on Ms. Steele’s lap.

The sudden loss of air pressure was the “loudest thing you’ve ever heard,” Mr. Steele, 36, said. They struggled to keep the oxygen mask on their daughter, who was screaming and turning redder by the minute.

The possibility that her child could have been sucked out of the plane didn’t hit Ms. Steele, 30, until after they landed. She has not set foot in an airplane since.

“I don’t know how comfortable I’m going to be taking little ones,” said Ms. Steele, who, along with her husband, filed a lawsuit against Alaska Airlines and Boeing, the manufacturer of the plane. The couple now has a second child, age 5 months. “Now, if we fly before they’re 2, it’s a given that they will somehow be strapped in.”

Follow New York Times Travel on Instagram and sign up for our Travel Dispatch newsletter to get expert tips on traveling smarter and inspiration for your next vacation. Dreaming up a future getaway or just armchair traveling? Check out our 52 Places to Go in 2025.





Source link

China’s Xi Courts Vietnam as Trade War With the U.S. Mounts

0


President Xi Jinping of China kicked off a weeklong tour of Southeast Asia Monday, landing in Hanoi and trying to rally other nations to Beijing’s side as American tariffs threaten manufacturing networks and economic growth.

In an essay published Monday in Vietnamese state media just before his arrival, Mr. Xi called on other countries to join with China in defending stability, free trade and “an open and cooperative international environment.”

“There are no winners in trade wars and tariff wars,” Mr. Xi wrote, echoing comments he made recently in Beijing. “Protectionism has no way out.”

Mr. Xi’s weeklong tour of Vietnam, Malaysia and Cambodia aims to amplify that message. As President Trump’s tariffs send shock waves through the global economy, Mr. Xi is both striking back against the United States, and telling the world that he is now the leader to rely on for wealth creation and for nations that feel betrayed by the wild swings of Mr. Trump’s “America First” agenda.

The next few days will likely be filled with dramatic, choreographed warmth — dozens of women in traditional Vietnamese dresses waving Chinese flags greeted Mr. Xi as he stepped onto the tarmac in Hanoi just before noon. But behind the scenes, there’s a lot of uncertainty.

Vietnam and its neighbors are all trying to appease President Trump to get tariffs lowered, which may make them resistant to making bold pro-China pronouncements. The U.S.-China trade war — involving whopping tit-for-tat tariffs and the suspension of critical rare earths exports by China — has also made every country more vulnerable to a global recession, and more confused about where the world order might be heading.

Mr. Xi, some analysts said, may be far more anxious than he shows.

“Xi will undoubtedly exude confidence,” said Bonnie Glaser, managing director of the Indo-Pacific Program at the German Marshall Fund. “But the unpredictable trajectory of China’s relations with the United States and the potential for decoupling of the U.S. and Chinese economies is likely extremely worrisome.”

Asia’s industrialized countries have a lot to lose. Many rose out of poverty alongside China through decades of free trade expansion, and the so-called reciprocal tariffs Mr. Trump announced this month slammed Asia harder than just anyone expected.

Vietnam found itself with a 46 percent tariff under calculations that put trade deficits at the center of the equation. For Cambodia, it was 49 percent while Malaysia’s rate was 24 percent.

Even with Mr. Trump’s sudden 90-day suspension of the levies, the threat of new taxes that would suppress demand and create new challenges for exporting nations has darkened the mood of the entire region, and made many countries question where to turn for help.

Vietnam is especially intertwined with both China, which is its largest trading partner, and the United States, which has been importing more and more from Vietnam ever since Mr. Trump’s first-term tariffs led companies to move production from China to other countries.

Vietnam’s exports to the U.S. — worth $137 billion in 2024 — and its huge investments from foreign companies seeking to diversify away from China are now both in jeopardy.

“Vietnam is today more vulnerable to both China and the U.S. than ever,” said Alexander Vuving, a professor at the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in Honolulu.

In response, Hanoi’s leaders are already trying to do what they have done for years — balance, flatter and hedge.

Teams of Vietnamese negotiators have gone to Washington to plead for lower tariffs, promising to buy more American products and lower trade barriers. This week, Vietnamese officials also pledged to crack down on the transshipment of Chinese products through Vietnam, which White House officials have described as a major impediment to lower tariffs.

Now Vietnam’s leaders — with a two-day visit by Mr. Xi that had been planned before the tariffs, to celebrate 75 years of formal relations — are trying to keep China happy too.

Dozens of deals are expected to be signed during Mr. Xi’s visit in an effort by both sides to show that collaboration will continue, regardless of American pressure.

And yet, the quantity (with 40 agreements expected) may obscure their incremental nature. The biggest ticket items known so far include a handful of planes made in China that will be flying tourist routes in Vietnam for the first time this week with a budget airline that has also promised to buy Boeing jets.

Vietnam has also signaled that it agreed to keep moving forward with a proposed railway from the Chinese border to a port outside Hanoi — a major infrastructure project that, if built, would deepen political and economic bonds between Hanoi and Beijing.

Many of the other agreements are expected to be broad and vague rather than specific. Despites bonds of communism, Hanoi’s top leaders have a long history of resisting Chinese projects that would strengthen Beijing’s leverage over Vietnam. Even the railway, which China has been pushing to finance with loans for years, has barely progressed beyond early stages of discussion.

Comments published Monday by To Lam, Vietnam’s top leader, the general secretary of its Communist Party, mostly sought to elevate Vietnam to a higher status, as a special country for China: Its largest trade partner in Southeast Asia and fourth largest trade partner in the world.

Mr. Vuving said Mr. Lam seemed to be trying to “forge close personal ties with Mr. Xi,” but without offering much in areas of clear tension, such as the South China Sea, where China and Vietnam have competing claims. Mr. Lam did not directly mention the issue.

Mr. Xi took a different approach, calling for more maritime cooperation “to properly control disagreements at sea.” He described relations between Vietnam and China in broader terms: They were joined in solidarity as members of the wider Global South.

Analysts said the approach reflected China’s broader goal, to use this trip as a way to build bonds with countries not just in Asia but elsewhere, and to bolster Mr. Xi’s image as a global statesman.

The reality is that China can only do so much for the economies of Vietnam, Cambodia and Malaysia. Its own economy is struggling with the legacy of a housing bust. The U.S. tariffs and Mr. Trump’s zero-sum approach to the world also means major exporters are in competition with one another — with suppliers of everything from phones to clothes hunting all over the planet for demand.

China has said it will seek to spur more domestic consumption, but mostly to help its own manufacturers. Analysts doubt there will be enough Chinese buyers to offset losses from the U.S. market while the trade war paralyzes investment and purchasing power for consumers.

“The tit-for-tat approach by the U.S. and the People’s Republic of China means that there may be less space for middlemen like Southeast Asian economies,” said Ja Ian Chong, a professor of political science at the National University of Singapore.

Countries like Vietnam are stuck, he added, “between a rock and a hard place.”

Tung Ngo contributed reporting from Ho Chi Minh City.



Source link

6 Ways to Calm Your Anxiety When Economic Stress Flares

0


Even before this year’s economic turmoil hit, financial anxiety among Americans was running high. Really high.

Four out of five Americans in a survey for Discover last year said they were worried about their money situation, with inflation, everyday expenses and the state of the economy leading a litany of concerns. Nearly two-thirds said they would be financially unprepared if they lost their job, and more than half felt the same way about a recession.

Now, tariffs and a global trade war, which could raise prices and discourage consumer and corporate spending, have economists raising their odds of such a downturn this year. Coupled with wild swings in the stock market, which is down about 9 percent for the year, it’s no wonder that financial anxiety is spiking to new heights.

“Since Covid, we’ve all just been waiting for the next shoe to drop, moneywise,” said Megan McCoy, a financial therapist and an associate professor of personal financial planning at Kansas State University. “For years now, it’s been one kind of painful financial situation after another. We can’t catch our breath.”

The danger is not just the financial anxiety, which has been linked to higher risk of various health problems, from depression to heart attacks. It’s also that the pressure can drive you to take actions that could ultimately make your financial situation worse.

“The urge people feel to do something to make themselves feel better can be overwhelming,” said Anne Lester, former head of retirement solutions for J.P. Morgan Asset Management and author of the book “Your Best Financial Life.” “But it’s hard to make sound decisions when you’re scared.”

Here are six strategies that experts say will help you keep a cool head and protect your money when anxiety is heating up.

It’s hard not to focus on the most recent hairpin turns of the stock market. In the span of just five trading days this month, the S&P 500 had one of the worst two-day drops on record (10.5 percent) followed by its best one-day climb since 2008 (9.5 percent). Add it up, though, and the index is down 4.4 percent for the month — and April isn’t even half over yet.

But what happens to stock prices in a single week, month or even year won’t matter in the long run to retirement savers, many of whom have decades to go before they stop working, said Brad Klontz, a financial psychologist and author of the book “Start Thinking Rich.” Even retirees often have an investment time frame that could span 20 or 30 years or more.

From that perspective, stocks still look like a smart investment for long-term growth, particularly when paired with fixed-income assets for stability. Over the past 100 years or so, stocks have returned 10 percent annually on average, Dr. Klontz said, handily beating other assets.

And while recessions are painful, he said, they’re a routine part of an economic cycle, happening every few years or so, and the country has always bounced back from them, too.

“What feels in the short term like you’re headed off a cliff is more like a speed bump when you look at it with a long-term perspective,” Dr. Klontz said.

Viewing your 401(k) performance with a different lens is helpful, too, Ms. Lester said.

“We tend to anchor on whatever our highest balance was, so you may be focusing on how much money you’ve lost since then,” she said. “But if you look at your balance from a year ago, you’re probably still up. And compared to five or 10 years ago, you’re likely up even more substantially.”

For some 401(k) investors, the urge to sell stocks as prices tumbled has proved too powerful to resist.

With these savers shifting money from stocks to fixed-income funds, the volume of 401(k) trading during the first quarter of 2025 was the highest in nearly five years, according to Alight Solutions, which tracks workplace retirement plan activity. (The activity involved less than 1 percent of total 401(k) plan balances, but the jump is notable.) The sell-off picked up additional steam after the free-fall in the market on April 3 and 4, with 10 times the usual volume on Monday, April 7, the next trading day — the most transactions in a single day since March 2020.

This shows how easy it is for anxiety to spur action that may not be in your best interest, since those sellers missed out on the surge in stock prices later in the week, which allowed the major indexes to recover a big chunk of the losses incurred so far this year.

“All decisions are bets — we never know if they’re wise or not until time has passed,” said Naomi Win, a clinical psychologist and behavioral analyst with Orion Advisor Solutions, a wealth management tech firm. “Resist the culture of immediacy by learning to pause and be thoughtful and take time on decisions rather than reacting on emotion.”

One way to do this: Impose a rule for yourself that you must wait at least an hour before making a trade; set a timer to hold yourself to it. And seek out advice first from a trusted source — a financial adviser, if you have one, or a knowledgeable friend or colleague with a calm head and experience in up and down markets.

This buys time to reverse the physiological response to acute financial anxiety. When stress rises, Dr. Klontz said, the body’s fight-or-flight response kicks in, enlarging the part of the brain that processes emotions like fear and anxiety (the amygdala) and shutting down the part that helps us evaluate options and make informed choices (the prefrontal cortex).

“It takes a good 30 minutes to an hour to calm down,” Dr. Klontz said. “Then the prefrontal cortex turns back on, and people are left feeling, ‘Why, why did I do that?’”

The pain of losing money is more powerful than the pleasure of making it — a cognitive bias that behavioral finance experts call loss aversion. That’s why constantly checking your 401(k) when the market is falling is a bad idea; seeing your lower balances only makes you feel worse.

It can also increase the likelihood that you’ll lose more money. According to studies from the behavioral economists Shlomo Benartzi and Richard Thaler, investors with long-term goals who rarely check their accounts end up earning significantly higher returns on average than those who monitor more often. Savers who check more frequently will more often see losses, which scares them off investing in stocks, even though stocks, over time, earn substantially more than bonds and cash.

If you check your account daily, for instance, you’re likely to see losses 30 to 40 percent of the time, historical data shows. If you check annually, you might observe a loss only once every three or four years or so. That’s why advisers suggest checking your balances no more than once a quarter and perhaps only once a year.

Try to limit your intake of bad news about the economy and market, too. “We are herd animals, wired to pay close attention to the mood of people around us,” Dr. Klontz said. “If you’re constantly exposed to the panic of others, you’re going to be very vulnerable to doing what everyone else is doing and making bad decisions as a result.”

It may sound counterintuitive, but identifying your biggest fear about your financial situation now, then thinking about how you’d manage the fallout, can be a calming exercise.

“Psychologically, simply knowing there are options reduces anxiety in an otherwise paralyzing situation,” Dr. Win said.

Say, for example, you’re worried about losing your job. The first thing you might do is calculate how long your emergency fund will last, then reach out to professional connections who could help with a job search. If your job hunt lasts a long time and you burn through your savings, what would you do next? Maybe you could move to a cheaper apartment, downsize or even move in with family for a while.

“The worst time to make crisis plans is when you’re in the middle of a crisis, because you’re not thinking as clearly — it’s the reason we do fire drills,” Ms. Lester said. “Hopefully, you’ll never have to pull the trigger on these plans, but it’s helpful to have them, to know what you’d do.”

You cannot control stock prices or whether the economy will tip into a recession. So focus on what you can control, especially actions that could improve your financial situation in a downturn.

Take spending. “If you don’t have enough cash set aside to cover your expenses for three to six months in case you’re laid off, you should be looking aggressively to cut back discretionary spending and get that emergency savings built,” Ms. Lester said. “You may feel like every nickel is already allocated, but for anybody who is getting takeout, traveling or who has more than zero subscription services, you can find places to cut back.”

If you’re worried you might lose your job in a recession, try to make yourself more indispensable by learning a new skill that is in high demand in your field. Or warm up your professional network by connecting with other people in your industry or develop a side hustle for extra income, Dr. Klontz suggested.

Finding other places in your life to assert control that have nothing to do with money can help calm financial anxiety, too — and provide a welcome distraction. Ms. Lester, for example, recently found respite from the market chaos by tidying her home office. Tending your garden, organizing family photos or taking a daily walk are activities that may give you a sense of mastery over your environment when your finances feel outside of your control.

“As soon as you start creating more order, even a little bit of control somewhere, you feel so much better,” Ms. Lester said.

Sometimes compounding the financial anxiety is a sense that you may be partly to blame for your money struggles.

“At times like these, people often see financial failures as personal failures: The market is crashing, and now I’m not going to have enough money because I didn’t make enough or save enough or I didn’t work hard enough or I’m not good enough at managing this stuff,” Dr. McCoy of Kansas State said.

She encourages a gentle reframing: “Tell yourself, ‘I did the best with what I knew at the time.’”

Ms. Lester said she also saw this pattern of self-blame frequently. “Understanding that we are hard-wired to behave certain ways under certain circumstances, and forgiving yourself, is really important,” she said. “Understand that there are many things you can do from this point forward to help yourself financially, take a deep breath, then take that next step.”



Source link

No Phone, No Internet: A First-Time Visit to Casablanca

0


According to my pathetic map, I should have been close to the royal palace. But nothing in Casablanca’s bustling Mers Sultan quarter, where trams rumble past shoe stores and cafes, looked remotely palatial. I tried one street, then the next. Finally, I approached some teenage girls in jeans and head scarves downing Diet Cokes outside a snack bar.

“I’m looking for the palace,” I said in rudimentary French, and pointed to my map. “It says it should be near here.”

One of the girls glanced at the creased sheet of paper, and in a voice laden with teenage contempt, asked, “Don’t you have a phone?”

No, I did not have a phone. Or rather, I did, but I wasn’t using it.

Except for buying my airplane ticket, my plan was to explore Casablanca — a Moroccan city I had never visited — without using the internet. That meant no online research, no GPS, no Ubers or Airbnbs, no virtual dictionary and no mindless scrolling to avoid social awkwardness.

At a time when more and more of us are feeling the need for a digital detox, I am keenly aware of how the internet, for all its benefits, has also changed travel for the worse. Not only does it play a key role in overtourism, but it has also flattened the sense of discovery. By allowing us to peruse restaurant menus, visualize sites and compile must-see lists, the internet tells us what we will experience before we arrive.

I could have used a guidebook, but that seemed contrary to the spirit of the endeavor. After all, my main goal was to see if I might restore the serendipity of exploring — and learn a few retro travel lessons along the way.

After flying into Casablanca’s Mohammed V Airport, my first order of business was to locate a map. I approached a woman seated at what I took to be the information desk. “Of course I have a map,” she replied. “I have a phone.”

She did, however, direct me toward the train to the city center. When I arrived at the airy station, I understood how difficult traveling unplugged here might be. There were no “You are here” signposts, no place to stash my luggage while I got oriented and no clear indications — at least not to this non-Arabic reader — of which direction led to the city center.

Still mapless, I picked a direction and started walking. A palm-lined boulevard seemed like a good bet, and soon I was amid shops and restaurants. Beyond a gate into what I took to be the old medina, I saw a hand-painted sign: “Ryad 91.”

I knew from previous trips to other Moroccan cities that “ryad” or “riad” means “inn.” Soon Mohammed, a tall, bespectacled man, was welcoming me in the cushion-bedecked lobby, and didn’t seem offended when I asked to see the sole remaining room, a bargain at 360 dirhams, or about $37. It was simple and clean, but a little claustrophobic, with a window that opened onto an interior courtyard. I took the room, deciding I would look for something more spacious the next day.

In the meantime, I asked Mohammed for a map. “One minute,” he said, sitting down at his computer and printing one out from Google. About a dozen streets on it bore names; the rest was a tangle of lines.

The good thing about ignorance is that it can turn everything into a discovery. And there was plenty that fascinated me along Casablanca’s winding alleyways: graceful minarets; bakers pulling hot, flat loaves from open-air ovens; the splash of street art, vivid against the whitewashed walls that gave Casablanca its name.

My wanderings began outside the inn’s door. Keeping the harbor to the right, I meandered westward, through the raucous food market, where vendors sold fat walnuts from carts, and leafy squares where men sat at low tables eating fried-fish sandwiches. Walking along bastions built when Portugal ruled the harbor, I saw a massive structure. I asked some boys who were diving into the ocean from a rocky beach what it was. “C’est la plus grande mosquée du monde” was the reply.

Had I really just stumbled across the largest mosque in the world? Alas, my informants were not entirely reliable. The Hassan II Mosque may have one of the world’s largest minarets, but is not itself the biggest. And as the tour buses around the corner proved, it is Casablanca’s chief attraction.

I could see why the boys exaggerated; with a capacity for 25,000 people, the mosque is designed to awe, and not only with its size. Every centimeter is covered in intricate craftsmanship, from plasterwork to mosaics to fretwork. At the accompanying museum, I learned it had taken 12,000 artisans to complete.

My strolls brought more discoveries: downtown streets lined with Art Deco buildings; contemporary Moroccan art at the elegant Villa des Arts; the Abderrahman Slaoui museum, with its Berber jewelry and colonial-era travel posters.

Traveling without expectations also makes you more observant of ordinary life. I loved coming across a man in a square selling coffee from a small pot, and the housewares store where frantic women in djellabas scrambled to get their hands on air fryers that had just gone on sale, some carting off three or four.

Casablanca wasn’t preening for tourists; it was too busy living its own life.

I found my second hotel on a street of bougainvillea-draped villas. The rooms at the Doge (about 2,200 dirham), once a private home, leaned hard into their Jazz Age origins, with velvet-lined walls and at least one Josephine Baker photo. Staying there, amid the inlaid furniture and orange-blossom-scented soaps, I tried not to wonder whether there was even a more exquisite Casablanca hotel I hadn’t found.

Traveling unplugged means letting go of the fear of missing out. The internet can convince us that its best-of lists are objective truths and that any traveler who does not work her way through them has settled for less.

I had to fight a twinge at the Central Market, where dozens of seafood stalls served fresh oysters and fish tagines. How to choose? I settled on Nadia’s because of the local businessmen there. Were the juicy grilled sardines drizzled with pungent chermoula sauce there the best in the market? They were the best I ate.

The same held true for the perfectly spiced chicken shawarma I sampled in the upscale Racine neighborhood, and the delicate gazelle horn pastries at a bakery in the Gauthier quarter — places I had chosen because they were busy with local customers.

But that strategy didn’t work in my quest for a sit-down restaurant serving traditional Moroccan food, since local diners often choose a cuisine different from the one they get at home. So when I walked into Le Cuistot’s tiled dining room, and heard Castilian Spanish, British English and New Jersey accents, I didn’t have high hopes.

But my couscous tfaya was fluffy, the vegetables flavorful, and the caramelized onions and almonds added just the right sweetness and crunch. When Aziz Berrada, the chef and owner, told me his couscous was the best in Casablanca, I believed him.

If so, it was just one of his talents. Before Aziz became a chef, he told me, he had been a photographer for Hassan II, the same monarch who had ordered the construction of the imposing mosque. When that monarch died, Aziz decided it was time for a career change.

My conversation with Aziz — which wouldn’t have happened if I had been buried in my phone while dining — made me eager to see the palace where he had worked. So on my last day, the receptionist at the Doge printed out yet another Google map.

That’s when I got lost. After getting no help from the soda-drinking teenagers, I wandered for blocks, eventually asking directions from an older man who pointed to red flags in the distance: the palace.

Only it wasn’t open to the public. Ever, apparently.

The internet would have revealed this. Yet as I grappled with the realization that I had spent hours to reach those impenetrable walls, I spied a street lined with bookshops. At the very least, I thought, I might find a decent map.

And I did. But the street also led to shops selling handwoven rugs and copper tea sets, a courtyard filled with barrels of olives and a warren of whitewashed alleys that reminded me of Andalusia even before I came across a tiny museum of Andalusian instruments.

The Habous neighborhood almost looked like a stage set of Morocco, which is fitting, since it was designed by the French in the 1920s and ’30s.

I learned this from a woman who introduced herself as Imane, when I stopped for mint tea at the Imperial Café. She was seated near me, and appeared to be either a celebrity or the mayor, so frequent were the salutations from passers-by. I asked if I could talk with her about the neighborhood.

“Of course, sweetheart,” she said in perfect English. “I love Americans. You’re so spontaneous.”

Imane suggested we move our conversation to a nearby location that she promised I would adore. I overcame my skepticism, figuring I might get some local recommendations.

As we walked, Imane’s rapid-fire monologue left little room to ask about her favorite restaurants. But I learned that she had once lived in the United States, selling real estate, working for a jewelry company and driving an Uber.

Finally we arrived at a set of walls only marginally less imposing than the palace’s. The guard ushered us through a carved door into a gorgeous building, with walls of green and blue geometric tiles and intricate plasterwork, and courtyards dotted with orange trees. I still had no idea where I was (later I learned it was a former courthouse and residence for the pasha, and is now used for cultural events). And I was mystified by the staff, including a stern-faced bureaucrat and a cleaning woman who greeted Imane effusively.

Who was Imane? A politician? A movie star?

Finally, it dawned on me. “Are you an influencer?” I asked.

“I don’t like labels,” she replied.

I never did learn Imane’s favorite restaurants. But she told me of her mission to spread the message that we are all connected. Eventually, she pulled out her phone to broadcast us, live, as we chatted.

I had come all this way without my phone. I had gotten lost and found my way, discovered monuments and tiny jewels. I had developed a sense of the city as a place that still existed primarily for its residents, not its visitors.

And there I was on someone else’s live social media feed.


Follow New York Times Travel on Instagram and sign up for our Travel Dispatch newsletter to get expert tips on traveling smarter and inspiration for your next vacation. Dreaming up a future getaway or just armchair traveling? Check out our 52 Places to Go in 2025.





Source link

Tax Tips for Those Who Haven’t Filed Their 2024 Returns

0


If you qualify, you can make tax-deductible contributions to an individual retirement account or a health savings account by the April 15 tax deadline and have them apply to tax year 2024, said Eva Simpson, vice president of member value, tax and advisory services with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

You can contribute up to $7,000 to a traditional I.R.A. for 2024 and an extra $1,000 if you’re 50 or older, the I.R.S. says. The size of your deduction depends on several factors, such as your filing status and whether you or your spouse, if you are married, is covered by a retirement plan at work.

Contributions to H.S.A.s are also tax-deductible, if you have a specific type of health insurance plan with a high deductible. If you’re eligible, you can contribute up to $4,150 (including any employer contributions) for 2024 if you have individual coverage, plus an extra $1,000 if you’re 55 or older, by the filing deadline.

There’s no federal tax deduction for contributing to 529 college savings plans, but some states offer deductions or credits on your state taxes. Most of them require the contributions to be made by the end of the calendar year to qualify, but eight (Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Wisconsin) let you make contributions up until the tax deadline and get a tax break for the prior year, according to the website Saving for College.

You can get an extension until Oct. 15 by filing Form 4868 by the April deadline.

But note: An extension gives you more time to file, but it doesn’t give you extra time to pay if you owe tax, Ms. DiMaggio said. You should estimate what you owe and send a payment with your extension form. Otherwise, you may face penalties on the balance due for paying late — 0.5 percent of the tax owed for each month the bill remains unpaid, up to a total of 25 percent. That can add up. If you owed $10,000, your penalty would be $50 a month, until the total reached $2,500.



Source link

Monday Briefing: China Pauses Crucial Exports

0


China has suspended exports of certain rare earth minerals and magnets that are crucial for the world’s car, semiconductor and aerospace industries. The move is in retaliation after President Trump’s sharp increase in tariffs.

The metals and the special magnets made with them can now be shipped out of China only with special export licenses. But Beijing has barely started setting up a system for issuing the licenses. Industry executives said that supplies of minerals and products outside the country could run low.

Trump’s rapidly escalating trade war with China has scrambled prospects for many global businesses. And there is no end in sight, my colleagues Ana Swanson and Ben Casselman report.

The U.S. administration has been waiting for the Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, to call Trump, but Beijing appears wary of putting Xi in an unpredictable situation with the U.S. president.

Charm offensive: Today, Xi will arrive in Vietnam, his first stop on a weeklong tour that will also take him to Malaysia and Cambodia. He is expected to oversee the signing of around 40 agreements, including deals that would advance plans for Vietnam to accept Chinese loans for part of a $8.3 billion railway connecting northern Vietnam with China.


Two Russian ballistic missiles yesterday slammed into the city center of Sumy, where Ukrainians had gathered to celebrate Palm Sunday. At least 34 people, including two children, were killed in what appeared to be the deadliest attack against civilians this year.

Video of the aftermath showed mangled and bloodied bodies laying motionless, burning cars and debris covering the road as screams and sirens wailed in the background.

Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, said the attack showed that Moscow had no real interest in a cease-fire despite the Trump administration’s efforts to broker one. Kyiv has warned that Russia is preparing to push into the Sumy region, in Ukraine’s northeast, and open a new front in the war.

Politics: Petro Poroshenko, a former president who now leads an opposition party, spoke to our Kyiv bureau chief about prospects for peace talks. He has recently stepped up his criticism of Zelensky.


The Trump administration revived talks with Saudi officials over a deal that would give Saudi Arabia access to U.S. nuclear technology and potentially allow it to enrich uranium.

“We’ve not reached the details on an agreement, but it certainly looks like there is a pathway to do that,” U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright said yesterday in Riyadh. For years, Saudi Arabia has pressed the U.S. to help it develop a nuclear energy program, as Saudi officials look beyond oil to provide energy and diversify the economy.

Iran: After a first meeting, U.S. and Iranian officials agreed to move forward in their talks on curbing Tehran’s nuclear program. A second meeting is planned for Saturday.


As climate change melts ice in the Arctic, the region is becoming more accessible and contested. The world’s major militaries from the U.S., Russia, China and Europe are all training for a winter war.

A reporter and a photographer traveled to Finland to watch the war games unfold.

Lives lived: Irmgard Furchner, a secretary at a Nazi concentration camp who was convicted of being an accessory to more than 10,000 murders, died at 99.

Three times a day, a fog drifts from nozzles hidden in flower beds and rolls down the hills in the Khao Yai Art Forest in Thailand. Created by the Japanese artist Fujiko Nakaya, this is one of many works by global artists there that transcend nature.

The art forest, which opened in February, focuses on site-specific works, farming and Buddhism. The project’s owner, Marisa Chearavanont, was driven to buy the site by her search for healing in nature after the Covid lockdown. Take a look.


That’s it for today. See you tomorrow. — Emmett

We welcome your feedback. Send us your suggestions at briefing@nytimes.com.



Source link

N.Y.C. Helicopter Company Shuts Operations After Deadly Crash, F.A.A. Says

0


The Federal Aviation Agency said late Sunday that a sightseeing helicopter company was shutting down its operations immediately after a deadly crash last week on the Hudson River.

The helicopter, operated by New York Helicopter Tours, was carrying six people when it crashed into the river on Thursday. None survived.

The F.A.A. said in statement on Sunday that it would launch an immediate review of the tour operator’s license and safety record, as well as cooperate with the National Transportation Safety Board’s investigation into the crash.

It was not immediately clear if New York Helicopter Tours had shut down voluntarily or under orders from the F.A.A. Reached by phone on Sunday, Michael Roth, the company’s owner and chief executive, declined to comment.

Earlier on Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, called on federal authorities to revoke the company’s operating license and stop its flights until the investigation was complete. He also urged the authorities to intensify scrutiny of helicopter tour companies in New York more broadly.

“We know there is one thing for sure about New York City’s helicopter tour companies: They have a deadly track record,” Mr. Schumer said at a news conference.

The helicopter crash killed all six people on board, including the pilot, Seankese Johnson, 36, and a family from Spain.



Source link

Launch of First Amazon Project Kuiper Internet Satellites Is Scrubbed

0


The battle of billionaires in space between Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk is ready to enter a new arena: satellite internet. But the contest will have to wait another day as weather along Florida’s Space Coast on Wednesday night interfered with a launch attempt.

Amazon, the company that Mr. Bezos started as an online bookseller three decades ago, is now a merchandising behemoth, the owner of the James Bond franchise, a seller of electronic gadgets like Echo smart speakers and one of the most powerful providers of cloud computing.

So perhaps it is not a surprise that Amazon is now launching the first few of thousands of satellites known as Project Kuiper to provide another option for remaining connected in the modern world. The market for beaming high-speed internet to the ground from orbit is currently dominated by Elon Musk’s SpaceX rocket company, which operates a similar service, Starlink. Starlink, with thousands of satellites in orbit and more launching nearly every week, already serves several million customers around the world.

The first 27 Project Kuiper satellites were scheduled to lift off on Wednesday between 7 and 9 p.m. Eastern time from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. They were to fly on an Atlas V, a rocket made by United Launch Alliance, a joint venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. U.L.A.

But the flight attempt was dogged by poor weather near the launch site, with rain, wind and cloudy conditions making a liftoff unsafe. After pushing back the launch time several times during the two-hour window, U.L.A.’s flight director decided to scrub the flight around 8:41 p.m.

The company is reviewing the next opportunity for a launch.

Project Kuiper will be a constellation of internet satellites intended to provide high-speed data connections to almost every point on Earth. Doing this successfully will require thousands of satellites, and Amazon’s goal is to operate more than 3,200 in the years to come.

The company will compete with SpaceX’s Starlink, a service that was originally marketed primarily to residential customers.

While Kuiper also aims for that market, particularly in remote areas, it will also be integrated with Amazon Web Services, the company’s cloud computing offering, which is popular with large corporations and governments around the world. That might make it more attractive to businesses that involve satellite imagery or weather forecasting that not only need to move large amounts of data across the internet, but also to perform calculations on the data.

Ground stations will connect the Kuiper satellites to the web services infrastructure in a manner that could also allow companies to communicate with their own remote equipment. For example, Amazon has suggested that energy companies could use Kuiper to monitor and control remote wind farms or offshore drilling platforms.

In October 2023, two prototype Kuiper satellites were launched to test the technology. Amazon said that the tests were successful. Those prototypes were never meant to serve in the operational constellation, and after seven months they were nudged back into the atmosphere, where they burned up. The company said it has since updated the designs of “every system and subsystem on board.”

“There’s a big difference between launching two satellites and launching 3,000 satellites,” said Rajeev Badyal, an Amazon executive in charge of Kuiper, in a promotional video ahead of the launch.

Amazon told the Federal Communications Commission in 2020 that service would begin after it had deployed its first 578 satellites. The company has said that it expects to connect customers to the internet later this year.

While a fully functional constellation needs thousands of satellites, the company can offer service in specific regions with far fewer in orbit before expanding to more global coverage later on.

The F.C.C.’s approval of the constellation came with a requirement that at least half the satellites needed to be deployed by July 30, 2026. Industry analysts say the company could get an extension if it has demonstrated substantial progress by then.

Getting the satellites into orbit also depends on rocket launches occurring on schedule, which can be a problem if enough rockets are not available. Amazon also needs to build hundreds of ground stations, to relay their signals to users.



Source link

Idaho Court Expands Abortion Ban Medical Exceptions

0


A state judge in Idaho appeared to slightly broaden access to abortion there by ruling on Friday that an exception to the state’s ban does not require the woman to be facing impending death.

Idaho’s ban, one of the strictest in the nation, prohibits abortion in almost all cases. One exception is when it is necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman. Judge Jason D. Scott ruled that abortions are allowed if a doctor deems that the woman is likely to die sooner without an abortion than she would otherwise — even if her death “is neither imminent nor assured.”

The ruling, which kept the law in place, handed a partial victory to reproductive rights advocates and Idaho doctors who said the ban had forced them to wait for patients to reach the brink of death before they could act, or rush them out of state to get care elsewhere.

“I feel very reassured” by the ruling, said Dr. Emily Corrigan, an Idaho obstetrician-gynecologist who is one of the plaintiffs. “I think there’s many, many more case scenarios where the patient’s condition would squarely fall within that exception.”

Idaho’s attorney general, Raúl Labrador, who was one of the defendants, said in a statement that Idaho law has never required doctors to wait until a woman’s death is certain or imminent before providing an abortion. “While we still disagree with portions of the ruling, it confirms what my office has argued in courts from Boise to Washington, D.C. — that Idaho’s abortion laws are constitutional and protect both unborn children and their mothers,” he said.

It was unclear on Saturday whether his office would appeal the decision.

The Idaho judgment arose from a lawsuit filed in September 2023 by the Center for Reproductive Rights on behalf of four women who said they had to leave the state to receive abortions after learning that they faced serious health risks or that their fetuses would not survive. The suit was joined by Dr. Corrigan, another physician and a family physicians’ organization.

The plaintiffs argued that state law should permit abortions in cases where continuing a pregnancy is unsafe or where the fetus has been diagnosed with a fatal condition.

Judge Scott of Idaho’s Fourth District did not go as far as the plaintiffs wanted, rejecting the claim that abortions should be allowed when a fetus won’t survive.

But he found that doctors may provide an abortion when, in their medical judgment, a patient “faces a non-negligible risk of dying sooner without an abortion,” even if death is not certain or immediate. The exception does not apply when that risk arises from potential self-harm, the judge ruled.

The lead plaintiff, Jennifer Adkins, 33, was 12 weeks pregnant with her second child when doctors told her the fetus had a rare genetic condition that carried a high mortality rate and that her pregnancy was probably nonviable. Doctors said that if Ms. Adkins did not miscarry, she would be at high risk of developing a life-threatening condition called mirror syndrome. Ms. Adkins, who lives in Caldwell, Idaho, near Boise, ultimately traveled 400 miles to Portland, Ore., for an abortion.

She said in an interview that she believed the judge’s ruling would have allowed her to get care in her home state.

“Having to go through something like that and lose a baby that you really, really wanted, in a place full of strangers, not surrounded by family and friends and providers that you know and trust, it was incredibly challenging, and it was incredibly sad,” she said.

In a separate case filed soon after the Supreme Court overturned the national right to abortion in 2022, the Biden administration sued Idaho over its abortion ban, arguing that the ban’s strict limits violated a federal law that requires hospitals to provide emergency care, including abortions, to any patient.

Idaho argued that its ban complied with the federal law, called the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act or EMTALA. Last year, the Supreme Court handed a temporary victory to the Biden administration, returning the case to a lower court that had put the ban on hold. But under the Trump administration, the Justice Department dropped the lawsuit, clearing the way for the ban to take effect in full.

In a similar lawsuit filed by St. Luke’s Health System, the largest hospital system in the state, a federal judge issued an order last month shielding its doctors from prosecution if they provided abortions in emergencies.

Dr. Corrigan said Friday’s ruling offers clarity to physicians statewide.

While the ruling applies only in Idaho, abortion-rights advocates said it illustrated the need for clearer and broader exemptions in other states that strictly ban abortion.

“The problem, whether you’re in Idaho or Texas or any of the other states that have a serious abortion ban, physicians are very conservative and very litigation-averse, very risk-averse,” said Laura Hermer, a professor at Mitchell Hamline School of Law whose research focuses on reproductive rights. “The states are trying assiduously to put the onus of this burden on health care providers.”

Many abortion opponents agree with Mr. Labrador’s contention that the existing exceptions are clear, and that doctors who claim otherwise are misreading the law.

Eleven other states ban abortion in almost all circumstances. Legal efforts to broaden the exemptions in those states have seen mixed results.

The Texas Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit that sought to expand exceptions for medical emergencies in the state, finding that the law already allowed abortions for women facing life-threatening conditions, “before death or serious physical impairment are imminent.”

In Tennessee, a lawsuit similar to the one in Idaho is pending.



Source link

Today on Sky Sports Racing: Hexham and Chantilly | Racing News

0



Hexham hosts our domestic action on Monday and we also have some fascinating contests from Chantilly, live on Sky Sports Racing…

3.15 Chantilly – Arizona Blaze, Polyvega and Apollo Fountain clash in the Group Three Prix Sigy

Polyvega made an emphatic start to 2025 when bolting up in a listed contest at Chantilly last time on debut for Christophe Ferland. She was twice placed in group company as a juvenile and is an exciting contender in the Group Three Prix Sigy from Chantilly this afternoon.

It could be a decent year for Amo Racing and they saddle Arizona Blaze here. This three-year-old colt has run some mighty races in Group One company including finishing second in the Breeders’ Cup Juvenile Turf Sprint. David Egan will be bullish of his chances in this competitive matchup.

Andre Fabre won this race last year with the excellent Sajir and has a great chance of winning this race again with Apollo Fountain. She was sent off a short-priced favourite in the Prix de Cabourg in July but was slightly hampered that day and could only manage fourth. Her main goal this season will be the French 1000 Guineas, and this could be a nice stepping stone for her.

British runners The Strikin Viking, Miss Lamai and King Of Light are also worthy of mentions.

2.48 Hexham – Course specialist Backbyjet bids for another success

Brian Ellison’s seven-year-old Backbyjet is a course winner and lines up in the Horslyx – For Horse’s Health & Welfare Handicap Chase. He needs to bounce back, having been well beaten here in December but has now fallen to a workable mark of 106, which is only one pound above his last winning mark.

Sean Quinlan gets the leg up on Heritier who comes here having finished a respectable fourth in the Go North One Man Class 2 series final last time and is likely to go close back in calmer waters.

Diamond Mix is yet to win from eight attempts and Paul Robson opts to drop back in trip, which could be the key.

Fostered Phil has clearly had issues having only ran twelve times and now eleven but was second on his sole start over fences and could hit the frame under Brian Hughes.

3.48 Hexham – Hat-trick seeking Halfway House Lad headlines.

Halfway House Lad made-all over course and distance last time and always seemed to be doing enough when holding Lewa House at bay. Useful three-pound claimer Charlie Price keeps the ride, and he is sure to go close in search for his hat-trick.

Course specialist Gibberwell has only been out of the frame on two occasions from eight starts at the track and won this race in 2023. Jake Coulson’s nine-year-old cannot be ruled out to back up his last-time-out course and distance win.

Dr Shirocco‘s record over the course and distance here reads 1,2,3 and the ground will be no issue for him. Philip Armson keeps the ride, and he should be competitive off this mark of 88, which is only one pound above when winning here in May.

Lucinda Russell’s pair Torosay and Return To Fire were behind Gibberwell at Hexham last time but the former won this race last year. They could both go close at a track they’ve run well at.

Best of the Rest

1.30 Chantilly – Hold My Hand represents Amy Murphy.

Amy Murphy has already struck four times in France this season and she is represented by Hold My Hand who was sent off favourite to make a winning debut last time out. She wasn’t able to sustain her effort that day, but she didn’t do much wrong and you’d hope there is more to come.

Limpide represents the in-form Francis-Henri Graffard and Mikael BArzalona combination here and she chased home another of Amy Murphy’s two-year-old’s on her debut. She’s another who should take a nice step forward and could be in the shake-ip.

Sbikha finished just ahead of Limpide that day and seemed to warm to her job nicely so shouldn’t be ruled out in her bid to go one better.



Source link