I’m still chipping away at my summer reading backlog over here, and this week finally made it to Alex Foster’s Circular Motion, which came out in May. And, wow, I wasn’t quite ready for the emotional journey this one took me on. It’s set in a near future — people ride OneWheels and going viral on social media is still a thing some strive for — where the megacompany CWC has created an extreme form of high-speed travel that allows people to zip across the world in no time flat. But, it soon becomes pretty clear that there’s a consequence for this. Earth is spinning faster and faster… and faster, and protestors blame CWC and the orbital circuit its travel system relies on.
The days grow shorter, the climate events become more extreme and everything is hurtling toward disaster. Circular Motion follows Tanner, a kid from smalltown Alaska who lands a job at CWC, Winnie, a girl who has truly been through it, and Columbia professor Victor Bickle, who shot to viral fame after predicting a public infrastructure catastrophe. They’re all connected, as we piece together through multiple POVs. This is a book that very blatantly has something to say about capitalism, climate change and everything in between, and a beautiful exploration of human connection in a crumbling world.
Like most Google apps, Messages A/B tests many features. However, it takes the RCS/SMS client a rather long time to actually launch these capabilities in stable even after they are announced. From various reports, Google itself, and devices we’ve checked, this is the current state of Messages.
Update 7/19:
Still rolling out (beta)
These are Messages features that Google announced or have been spotted in the wild by beta users.
[New] MLS encryption and Details page redesign
Universal Profile 3.0 adds support for the Messaging Layer Security (MLS) protocol that makes possible cross-platform (Android-iOS) RCS that is end-to-end encrypted (E2EE).
Advertisement – scroll for more content
You can check whether this is live for a conversation by long-pressing on a message and opening the redesigned Details page. This is now a fullscreen UI that explains the redesigned “Sent” and “Delivered” checkmarks, which have yet to widely launch. The portion relevant to MLS is the “Encryption Protocol” section. Value “0” is the existing E2EE, while value “1” is the upcoming approach.
[New] Standalone gallery
Google is addressing a complaint about the fullscreen camera and gallery redesign introduced in June by letting users access the latter separately. You can open the ‘plus’ menu for a new “Gallery” grid that takes up the entire screen. “Camera” opens the existing combined interface.
The shortcut at the end of the text box will presumably remain unchanged as the default.
Material 3 Expressive redesign
The chat interface is now its own container with rounded corners at the top. Google has removed the bubbly backgrounds for solid colors. The ‘plus’ menu is its own container with larger pills that lack any background color.
Old vs. new
The Emoji, GIFs, Stickers, and Photomoji pickers make use of connected button groups, with that row and the search bar flipped. As such, you don’t have back-to-back text fields.
The “Search messages” page has been redesigned with heavy use of containers.
That’s also the case in the “New chat” contacts list.
Google has revamped how images appear in a thread, with photos sent at the same time now grouped together. The fullscreen image viewer has also been redesigned with a blurred background and preview of the last and next image, while you can react from the new bottom row.
Finally, the Settings page also gets Material 3 Expressive.
Sensitive Content Warnings
This safety feature blurs images “that may contain nudity” with the ability to delete them before viewing. It also reminds “users of the risks of sending nude imagery and preventing accidental shares” before they send or forward something that may contain nudity.
Sensitive Content Warnings work on-device (via Android System SafetyCore), with no “classified content or results” sent to Google. Those over 18 can optionally enable it from Messages Settings > Protection & Safety > Manage sensitive content warnings.
Read receipts redesign
Following the last redesign in early 2023, another revamp places read receipts in a circle at the bottom-right corner of message bubbles (and images).You swipe left to see all timestamps and the end-to-end encryption status, while you swipe left to reply/quote a message. This started rolling out in August 2024, with more people receiving it in November.
Ellipsis
Sending
Single check with ring
Sent
Double check with ring
Delivered
Double check solid circle
Read
In January 2025, Google tweaked the design to make the circular background white. In no longer matching the bubble color, the read receipts stand out a great deal more.
L-R: Current, redesign, latest
Dual SIM RCS support
More than one SIM card will appear as “Connected” in Settings > RCS chats. This will aid international RCS adoption. It started rolling out in January 2024 but was later pulled, with more reports this August. As of late October, many more people — including in the US and physical + eSIM — are getting it.
As of January 2025, more people are seeing dual SIM RCS enabled.
Coming soon
Key Verifier
At The Android Show in May, Google announced Key Verifier to “help protect you from scammers who try to impersonate someone you know” in Google Messages. This tool lets you “verify the identity of the other party through public encryption keys.” Contact keys take the form of a scannable QR code that will be available in the Google Contacts app.
For example, if an attacker gains access to a friend’s phone number and uses it on another device to send you a message – which can happen as a result of a SIM swap attack – their contact’s verification status will be marked as no longer verified in the Google Contacts app, suggesting your friend’s account may be compromised or has been changed.
Google says “Key Verifier will launch later this summer in Google Messages on Android 10+ devices.”
Recent launches (stable)
Custom group chat icons
Instead of seeing up to four small circular profile pics of contacts in group chats, Google Messages will let you set a custom image. Open Group details or tap the top bar of the conversation, then hit the camera icon in the corner to upload.
Delete for everyone: Messages may still be seen by others on older app versions
Delete for me
Snooze notifications
You can now “Snooze chat” for: 1 hour, 8 hours, 24 hours, or Always. To do so, long-press on a conversation from the main list for the new alarm clock icon or find it in the contacts Details page. The conversation will be grayed out with the clock icon underneath the time/date, while you also get a banner inside the chat where you’ll find “Stop snooze.”
RCS status in ‘New chat’ contacts list
The “New conversation” page becomes the “New chat” — which is more closely aligned with RCS terminology — list. Contacts with RCS get a badge at the right, while their name and number feature Dynamic Color theming instead of just being black/white (SMS).
Gallery + camera redesign with ‘Original quality’ sending
Google Messages has merged the camera viewfinder and gallery. The old image picker was more compact and kept you in the conversation. When taking a photo or video, you’ll always see 3-6 recent shots. Swiping up reveals more (with “Folders” at the bottom), while you can “Write a caption” before sending.
With this redesign, Google is rolling out the ability to send pictures and videos in “Original quality.” There are two media quality options when sending:
“HD” Optimize for chat: Send quality media faster, uses less data
“HD+” Original quality: Sends at full media resolution
This has been in testing since November, and is now widely available.
Expanded text field limit
After limiting the text field to four lines, Google Messages is letting the box get much taller at 14.
Real-time and expanded Scam Detection
Announced at the start of March, Google Messages will “flag conversational text patterns commonly associated with scams,” especially those that “seem harmless, but turn dangerous over time.” This works on-device, with users seeing a “Scam Detection” card that says “Likely scam: Suspicious activity detected. Common scams often start this way.” You can “Report & block” or tap “Not a scam.” This measure targeting conversational scam is part of the existing Google Messages Settings > Spam protection setting. It is “launching in English first in the U.S., U.K. and Canada and will expand to more countries soon.”
SPRINGFIELD — The competition was fierce among dragons along the Connecticut River on Saturday.
The battle was between canoes in the 11th Springfield Dragon Boat Festival, which saw pencil-like boats operated by teams that gathered at North Riverfront Park.
If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
But AI tools are more and more asking for gross levels of access to your personal data under the guise of needing it to work. This kind of access is not normal, nor should it be normalized.
Not so long ago, you would be right to question why a seemingly innocuous-looking free “flashlight” or “calculator” app in the app store would try to request access to your contacts, photos, and even your real-time location data. These apps may not need that data to function, but they will request it if they think they can make a buck or two by monetizing your data.
These days, AI isn’t all that different.
Take Perplexity’s latest AI-powered web browser, Comet, as an example. Comet lets users find answers with its built-in AI search engine and automate routine tasks, like summarizing emails and calendar events.
In a recent hands-on with the browser, TechCrunch found that when Perplexity requests access to a user’s Google Calendar, the browser asks for a broad swath of permissions to the user’s Google Account, including the ability to manage drafts and send emails, download your contacts, view and edit events on all of your calendars, and even the ability to take a copy of your company’s entire employee directory.
Comet’s requested access to a user’s Google account.Image Credits:TechCrunch
Perplexity says much of this data is stored locally on your device, but you’re still granting the company rights to access and use your personal information, including to improve its AI models for everyone else.
Perplexity isn’t alone in asking for access to your data. There is a trend of AI apps that promise to save you time by transcribing your calls or work meetings, for example, but which require an AI assistant to access your real-time private conversations, your calendars, contacts, and more. Meta, too, has been testing the limits of what its AI apps can ask for access to, including tapping into the photos stored in a user’s camera roll that haven’t been uploaded yet.
Signal president Meredith Whittaker recently likened the use of AI agents and assistants to “putting your brain in a jar.” Whittaker explained how some AI products can promise to do all kinds of mundane tasks, like reserving a table at a restaurant or booking a ticket for a concert. But to do that, AI will say it needs your permission to open your browser to load the website (which can allow the AI access to your stored passwords, bookmarks, and your browsing history), a credit card to make the reservation, your calendar to mark the date, and it may also ask to open your contacts so you can share the booking with a friend.
There are serious security and privacy risks associated with using AI assistants that rely on your data. In allowing access, you’re instantly and irreversibly handing over the rights to an entire snapshot of your most personal information as of that moment in time, from your inbox, messages, and calendar entries dating back years, and more. All of this for the sake of performing a task that ostensibly saves you time — or, to Whittaker’s point, saves you from having to actively think about it.
You’re also granting the AI agent permission to act autonomously on your behalf, requiring you to put an enormous amount of trust in a technology that is already prone to gettingthingswrong or flatly making things up. Using AI further requires you to trust the profit-seeking companies developing these AI products, which rely on your data to try to make their AI models perform better. When things go wrong (and they do, a lot), it’s common practice for humans at AI companies to look over your private prompts to figure out why things didn’t work.
From a security and privacy point of view, a simple cost-benefit analysis of connecting AI to your most personal data just isn’t worth giving up access to your most private information. Any AI app asking for these levels of permissions should send your alarm bells ringing, just like the flashlight app wanting to know your location at any moment in time.
Given the reams of data that you hand over to AI companies, ask yourself if what you get out of it is really worth it.
Netflix admitted during its earnings call on Thursday that it used generative AI to create VFX in The Eternaut, a Netflix original from Argentina that was released in April 2025. The company’s co-CEO Ted Sarandos said that generative AI was specifically used for a VFX shot in the post-apocalyptic drama, but the move is one of several ways Netflix is embracing AI.
According to Sarandos, the creators of The Eternaut wanted to include a shot of building collapsing in Buenos Aires, and rather than contract a studio of visual effects artists to create the footage, Netflix used generative AI to create it. “Using AI powered tools, they were able to achieve an amazing result with remarkable speed,” Sarandos shared during the earnings call. “In fact, that VFX sequence was completed 10 times faster than it could have been completed with… traditional VFX tools and workflows.”
The shot “just wouldn’t have been feasible for a show on that budget,” Sarandos says, as someone with some input on the show’s budget. The executive says that The Eternaut features “the very first Gen AI final footage to appear on screen in a Netflix original series or film.” Clearly, the show is also a prototype for how Netflix can avoid costs it doesn’t want to swallow in the future.
Workers in the entertainment industry have not taken kindly to the use of generative AI. Labor strikes — including the recently resolved SAG-AFTRA video game strike — have made securing protections against AI a central issue. The Oscar-nominated film The Brutalistcame under fire in 2024 for using AI tools during production. Beyond that, whether generative AI models were illegally trained on copyrighted material is still an open question.
Netflix plans to use generative AI to create ads for its ad-support Netflix subscription, and the company is reportedly testing a new search feature powered by OpenAI models. Using generative AI in production might seem par for the course for a company that’s already invested, but it could help to normalize a technology that many creatives remain actively against.
Welcome to episode 62 of Pixelated, a podcast by 9to5Google. This week, we’re prepping for all things Pixel 10. With Made By Google officially announced for August 20th, we have less than five weeks to go until new Google hardware hits our desk. From phones to wearables, earbuds to foldables, there’s a lot to look forward to — and frankly, it might all boil down to some software secrets we don’t know much about yet.
Subscribe
Timecodes
00:00 – Made By Google announced
03:58 – Tensor G5
12:33 – Pixel 10
22:39 – Pixel Sense and Google’s mobile AI push
28:40 – Pixel Watch 4
35:13 – Pixel Buds 2a
37:34 – Pixel accessories and final thoughts
Hosts
Read more
Listen to more 9to5 Podcasts
Feedback?
Drop us a line at gtips@9to5g.com, leave a comment on the post, or reach out to our producer.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
For weeks at a time, assisted living residents in wheelchairs on the top level of Gabriel House couldn’t leave their floor, trapped by a broken elevator that management wasn’t in any hurry to fix.
Because they couldn’t make it downstairs to the communal dining room, meals were brought up to them. Medical appointments were often missed because there wasn’t any means of egress.
And because they couldn’t go outdoors, residents in wheelchairs who smoked cigarettes or cannabis often did so in their studio-style rooms.
In the aftermath of the July 13 fire that ripped through the Gabriel House in Fall River and killed at least nine residents, MassLive interviewed multiple people — residents, family members, current and former employees — who detailed the third-floor confinement at the assisted living facility during prolonged elevator outages.
It’s one example of unsettling conditions at the former motel-turned-assisted living facility in the blue-collar city’s Kennedy Park area.
They also described sanitary and safety issues that trace back years, including rodents, cockroaches and a perceived absence of emergency planning, corroborated by state and city records.
Fall River Fire Chief Jeffrey Bacon has said fire drills were conducted at the assisted living facility for staff members, but current and former residents and employees said they haven’t participated in an emergency drill in at least four years.
“No fire drills, we didn’t do anything … no practices,” Debra Johnson, a certified nursing assistant and employee for the past four years, told reporters the day after the fire.
The son of Alvaro Vieira, a 64-year-old resident injured in the fire, said his father recalls one fire drill about five years ago, but none since.
His father has “been having problems the last couple years … it’s really obviously one of the cheaper nursing homes,” Chris Vieira, 33, of New Bedford, said.
A former employee who agreed to speak with MassLive under the condition of anonymity said there weren’t any drills at the facility. She said residents “deserved better care” and that the building was like a matchbox.
“We’ve always said it’s in that spot — ready to go up. That if somebody starts a fire, there’s going to be an issue,” the former employee said.
Despite the reported conditions, residents and staff members described the community at Gabriel House as one where people looked out for and cared for one another. One employee wrote in a Facebook post that, “If you were lost and had nowhere to go, you had Gabriel House.”
Anthony Hout lived there from 2017 to 2022. He said the caring staff members “loved us to death,” but any time something was reported to the higher-ups, “it just got blown off. They ignored everything we said to them.”
Messages left for Gabriel House owner Dennis Etzkorn have not been returned. One person who answered the phone said, “Not available,” and quickly hung up when a reporter identified themselves.
Etzkorn faced legal troubles more than a decade ago with a different company, unrelated to safety concerns, including criminal charges in 2012 for a suspected Medicare kickback scheme involving his company, Gabriel Care.
The case was dropped after the court ruled prosecutors had illegally obtained evidence, and key evidence, such as caregiver testimony, was deemed inadmissible. Etzkorn reached a $950,000 settlement with the Attorney General’s Office in 2015 in exchange for the charges being dismissed.
1/9
The Gabriel House assisted living facility fire in Fall River
Elevator outages would last months
Multiple people told MassLive the building’s elevator would consistently break down and not be repaired by management for weeks to months at a time — most recently, for more than six months.
While people on the second floor could access the ground level via a ramp, residents with limited mobility on the third floor were effectively stuck.
Those who couldn’t take the stairs would miss doctor’s appointments, the former employee said.
“That elevator, it was every year. There was a problem with that elevator every single year. It was really bad,” said Chris Vieira.
Terry Leuvelink, whose 86-year-old mother, Eleanor Willett, died in the fire, recalled the elevator being down for “eight months” at one point. Living in walking distance, she visited often, sometimes sleeping on Willett’s floor on a blowup mattress.
Third-floor residents with mobility challenges were unable to come down to the dining room, Leuvelink said, so staff would bring meals to their rooms.
“They couldn’t go outside to smoke their cigarettes, so that’s why people were smoking in their rooms,” she said.
Under Massachusetts law, buildings open to the public and multi-family residences, such as the Gabriel House, must have elevators inspected annually. Building owners can be fined if they fail to comply with the regulations.
According to the Americans with Disabilities Act, elevators can be afforded temporary and isolated disruptions, but building owners are expected to repair them promptly.
Details remain unclear about the Gabriel House elevator’s inspection history and response to recent outages. A Seekonk-based company, believed to have serviced the elevator, did not return requests for comment.
MassLive has requested state inspection records from the Board of Elevator Regulations but has not yet received them.
Sanitary and care management concerns
Many who lived at the Gabriel House didn’t have close family members and required a lot of assistance with mobility and medical needs, the former employee told MassLive.
At a typical assisted living facility, residents receive multiple meals a day with limited medical and home care provided. Generally, people residing in assisted living have a level of independence and don’t require the significant 24/7 medical attention provided by nursing homes.
At Gabriel House, the lines were blurred.
Paul Lanzikos, co-founder of the Dignity Alliance of Massachusetts and a former state secretary of elder affairs under Gov. Michael Dukakis, said it appeared that many of the people residing at Gabriel House could not “self-evacuate,” meaning they likely required higher levels of care than what is provided in assisted living.
Body camera footage released by the city from the night of the fire showed police officers and firefighters carrying numerous people using wheelchairs, scooters and walkers down multiple flights of outside stairs or ladders, signaling that they resided on the upper floors.
The sanitary conditions at the facility were also concerning, multiple people told MassLive.
Many studio units were in disrepair, with some featuring stained rugs and others electrical wires hanging from gaping holes in bathroom ceilings.
“It was cockroach-infested. Bed bugs, mice. The rooms were filthy,” Johnson said.
Records provided to MassLive by the Fall River Department of Health and Human Services include several invoices from 2024, 2020, 2015 and 2014 for treatment of bed bugs and extermination of mice, rats and cockroaches by local pest control companies.
The records also include complaints made to the city. In February 2020, one Gabriel House resident complained of “bed bugs moving from one room to another.”
Another complaint, sent to the city in September 2014, cited bed bugs, undercooked food and a “filthy” dining room.
Fall River Mayor Paul Coogan told MassLive that the city didn’t receive a noticeable number of complaints from Gabriel House compared to all the complaints they receive across the city. He was unaware of the conditions being reported after the fire.
“No one is more feeling guilty for these people than me, for what happened to them and from the descriptions of what went on in there, but I didn’t know a thing,” Coogan said.
Leuvelink, the daughter of Eleanor Willett, said their first tour of the Gabriel House was “scary” and “not impressive at all.” But it was affordable compared to other assisted living facilities they’d visited, and Willett was just happy to have a roof over her head close to family members, she said.
The average monthly cost of assisted living in Massachusetts ranges from $3,655 to $8,036, according to the Executive Office of Aging and Independence. At Gabriel House, residents were charged between $1,850 and $2,400 a month.
Leuvelink recalled the building smelling like urine. She cited old rugs and a ripped couch in the main sitting room. Before her mother moved in last July, her studio unit was renovated, which pleased the family.
But then Willett began to see the mice and cockroaches.
“She couldn’t sleep,” Leuvelink said. “And she was scared to death. She thought they were going to climb in her bed with her.”
Leuvelink bought some BugMD spray and put out cotton balls soaked in peppermint oil in her mother’s room. The Gabriel House also installed “sticky mouse traps.”
“One day they put a sticky trap right near my mom’s bathroom, near where my mom kept her personal things,” Leuvelink recounted. “So my mom went to go to the bathroom and the bottom of her pants got stuck on one of the sticky things and she couldn’t get it off. She had to cut the pants just to get the sticky thing off.”
Alvaro Vieira’s initial admission to the Gabriel House happened in a matter of days — a sign that something was off, Chris Vieira said, as the family had been on waiting lists for months.
His father was still on several waiting lists when the Gabriel House fire broke out, the son added.
“When he got there, we knew it was already going to be a little problem, because he got in so easy … they just took him in. I was like, ‘Yeah, that doesn’t sound right,’” Chris Vieira said.
From the start, Chris said the staff didn’t properly care for his father’s medical needs.
Alvaro Vieira had a stroke in his 40s that left half of his body paralyzed, and he required specific medication when he was admitted to the Gabriel House, which was to be administered under supervision.
But several weeks after his admission, Chris Vieira’s sister found stockpiles of medication in their father’s room — which showed he wasn’t taking the medication under proper supervision and was hiding it himself.
This was “a big deal” and a “serious issue,” Chris Vieira said, and though it was solved after the family spoke with facility management, the incident left them worried.
In 2023, Gabriel House and its owner, Etzkorn, were subjects of a state compliance report by the Executive Office of Elder Affairs. The report identified a number of violations by the facility, especially when it came to proper and updated documentation of resident care.
Many residents’ records lacked necessary reassessments and reviews, and documentation for the Evidence Informed Falls Prevention program was missing for all reviewed years, raising concerns about resident safety.
There were also missing documents for eye drop medications and improperly stored medications, and inconsistencies in the Gabriel House’s “correspondence log,” which helps ensure reliable, continued resident care.
Additionally, the report included 26 incident reports for resident emergencies that were filed beyond the required 24-hour reporting window, and three employees’ health records were missing.
Over the past year, the Vieira family fought hard for the stained, smelly carpet in Alvaro Vieira’s room to be replaced with wood flooring, his son said. It had only been replaced just before the fire.
The daughter of an 82-year-old resident who escaped the fire, speaking on the condition of anonymity to protect her family’s privacy, said the carpeting inside Gabriel House was “disgusting.” The building was “run down and old,” she said, but her mother settled in and made friends during the two months she lived there, several of whom died in the fire.
Alvaro Vieira, who was rescued from his bathroom window and carried from the burning building, was hospitalized but is “doing well,” his son said. He is “refusing to go back” to the Gabriel House under any circumstances.
Donna Murphy, a five-year resident, said the facility’s owner “didn’t care about people’s lives.” She wasn’t at the Gabriel House the night of the fire — she’d gone to visit family, the only night she’d been away in her entire time living there.
Murphy listed several issues she had at the facility, including exposed electrical wiring in her bathroom, which made her feel unsafe.
“I hated taking a shower,” she said. “All the wires were exposed. It was dangerous … they’re slum lords,” she said of the owner.
Is it time for new assisted living regulations, both state and federal?
Nearly 18,000 people reside in assisted living settings in Massachusetts, according to the state’s annual census for 2025. The facilities aren’t regulated like nursing homes, which are subject to both federal and state-specific standards.
Assisted living facilities exist in a gray area that allows for varying interpretations state by state, and ultimately, facility by facility.
“Assisted living is not regulated by the federal government at all, even though there is a fair amount of money going into assisted living at this point from Medicaid,” said Toby Edelman, senior policy attorney at the Center for Medicare Advocacy. “All of the regulation is at the state level. So whatever the states do is what they do.”
Edelman believes it’s time for the federal government to step in, given the rise of the assisted living industry as a growing model of desired care over the last 25-plus years.
“We’re spending a lot of Medicaid money and have no Medicaid regulations (for assisted living),” she said. “That makes no sense to me. There should be some federal standards to get the money.”
At Gabriel House, approximately 75% of residents were on MassHealth, the state’s Medicaid program.
In Massachusetts, unlike nursing homes, there are no specific staffing requirements for assisted living facilities, according to the standards outlined in state law.
Facilities must develop and implement their own process to determine staff levels, and must have “sufficient staffing at all times” for resident needs as deemed by the facility owners’ assessments on a “24-hour per day basis.”
Johnson, the current employee at Gabriel House, said it was typical for two workers to be on duty during night shifts — and sometimes, there was only one at the facility. Others corroborated that.
“They would say, ‘we just need a body,’” Johnson said, and emphasized “a body.”
Massachusetts law does address the need for emergency plans at assisted living facilities, but it doesn’t include many specifics.
“An emergency preparedness plan is critical,” said Alice Bonner, senior advisor for aging at the Institute for Health Care Improvement and former state secretary of elder affairs from 2015 to 2019. “If there is no other take-home message, I would say it’s just really important people in the public know that.”
“Educating people who live and work in these environments because they should know that emergencies can happen and how they would respond,” she said.
Staffing levels and emergency preparedness plans at assisted living facilities are subject to multiple annual reviews by the Executive Office of Aging and Independence.
Lanzikos, of the Dignity Alliance, is laser-focused on turning the Gabriel House tragedy into “meaningful reform” at the state level. And he’s not alone — a chorus of state officials and senior care advocates have echoed similar sentiments over the last week.
In the days since the fire, the Dignity Alliance has already sent a letter to Attorney General Andrea J. Campbell about “the development of comprehensive assisted living regulations that bring us into the 21st century.” It also released a policy reform framework outlining the “failures exposed” by the fire and key recommendations.
On Friday, Gov. Maura Healey announced the state was taking immediate action in light of the Gabriel House fire. Starting next week, the Executive Office of Aging and Independence will launch a statewide fire and life safety initiative to ensure all 273 assisted living residences in Massachusetts are prepared to protect residents during emergencies.
Facilities will be required to submit disaster and emergency preparedness plans for state review within 30 calendar days, as well as issue a letter to residents and families outlining the plans within five business days.
“We need to make sure that the buildings, the staffing, the training and the overall administration of assisted living residences are appropriate to meet the needs of the folks who are inhabiting them today,” Lanzikos said.
If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Greptile, an AI-powered code review startup, is in the process of raising a Series A. Sources familiar with the deal tell TechCrunch it’s for $30 million at a $180 million valuation led by Benchmark partner Eric Vishria. But one person says that the deal hasn’t closed and terms may change.
Founded by Dasksh Gupta after he graduated from Georgia Tech in 2023, the startup went through Y Combinator in the winter of 2024 cohort, and raised a $4 million seed round led by Initialized Capital after completing its program.
Gupta told TechCrunch last year that the bot his company developed acts as an experienced coworker, possessing a deep understanding of the customer’s code, which enables it to pinpoint bugs and other potential issues that human reviewers might miss.
As with most areas of AI, the code review space is very competitive.
Greptile’s most prominent rivals include Graphite, a startup that earlier this year raised a $52 million Series B led by Accel with participation from Anthropic’s Anthology Fund with Menlo Ventures, a16z, and others. Another key competitor is Coderabbit, which last year secured a $16 million Series A from CRV.
The intense competition has driven Greptile to require its staff to work exceptionally long hours.
The then 22-year-old Gupta posted on X in November that Greptile “offers no work-life-balance.” Employees typically work from 9 am until 11 pm, including Saturdays, and sometimes Sundays, he wrote.
Techcrunch event
San Francisco | October 27-29, 2025
After the post went viral, Gupta told multiple news outlets that outperforming the competition demands maximum effort from every team member. “No one cares about the third-best company, or even the second-best company in any category in software. If you’re going to put in 95 percent effort, it’s the equivalent of putting in 0 percent effort,” Gupta said in an interview with Inc.
Whatever the work culture, attracting an A-list VC like Benchmark at a healthy Series A valuation, could also be helpful in Greptile’s journey.
Greptile and Benchmark did not respond to a request for comment.
If I had to describe the status of Subnautica 2 in just three words, it would be these: messy, messy, messy. That’s not to say the game itself is in terrible shape — this is actually a pivotal claim in the whole situation — but the relationship between Subnautica series developer Unknown Worlds and its parent company, Krafton, is in shreds. This month alone, Krafton fired the founders and CEO of Unknown Worlds, Subnautica 2 was delayed until 2026 and the ousted leaders filed a lawsuit against Krafton, looking to regain creative control of the game and the studio. At the center of the conflict is a bonus payment worth up to $250 million.
Here’s a rundown of how we got here and what in the devil is going on with Subnautica 2, Krafton and Unknown Worlds.
Krafton
Charlie Cleveland accidentally started Unknown Worlds in 2001 while building the popular Half-Life mods Natural Selection and Natural Selection 2, and technical director Max McGuire came on as an official studio co-founder in 2006. Inspired by Minecraft and burned out on mods, Unknown Worlds began working on the undersea, open-world exploration game Subnautica and released it in early access on Steam in 2014. With years of community feedback, the game evolved into a singularly tense and rich survival experience, and version 1.0 officially landed in 2018. This is also when Ted Gill joined the studio’s executive team, freeing up Cleveland to focus on creative direction. Subnautica and its spin-off, Subnautica: Below Zero, attracted millions of players and established Unknown Worlds as a successful independent team.
So, the larger studios came sniffing. PUBG publisher Krafton, which operates with billions of dollars annually, purchased Unknown Worlds in 2021 for $500 million. The acquisition came with the promise of an additional payout worth up to $250 million if Unknown Worlds hit certain performance goals by the end of 2025. This bonus is a critical piece of the chaos today.
We know more about the details of this deal thanks to recent reporting by . In addition to the leadership positions, which were filled by Cleveland, Gill and McGuire, Unknown Worlds had about 40 employees at the time of the Krafton sale, and they received payouts totaling $50 million at closing and over the following two years. This larger group was poised to receive as much as $25 million in the 2025 performance-based earnout, with each person expecting a different amount, but most estimating six or seven figures. The remaining $225 million was reserved for the Unknown Worlds leadership, but they said they intended to share a portion of their windfall with employees who weren’t included in the bonus, covering the full studio headcount of about 100 people.
Krafton
The leadership of Unknown Worlds repeated this promise in a lawsuit filed against Krafton on July 10, 2025. But we’re getting ahead of ourselves.
After the acquisition, Unknown Worlds continued updating Subnautica and Below Zero. In February 2024, the studio released Moonbreaker, a turn-based strategy game that never really took off, partially because of its . Since then, the studio has been focused on Subnautica 2. The game was with a prospective early access launch window of 2025. It’s currently the second-most wishlisted game on Steam, after Hollow Knight: Silksong.
The first public notion that something was rotten between Unknown Worlds and Krafton came on July 2, when Cleveland, Gill and McGuire were fired and replaced by former Callisto Protocol studio head Steve Papoutsis. Krafton didn’t provide a reason for the switch-up , instead offering the following nearly complete thought: “While Krafton sought to keep the Unknown Worlds’ co-founders and original creators of the Subnautica series involved in the game’s development, the company wishes them well on their next endeavors.”
Krafton didn’t mention delaying the early access launch at this time, but it implemented a review process that it said would be “essential to delivering the right game at the right time.” The publisher suggested the ousted leaders had been uncooperative in this aspect.
“Unknown Worlds’ new leadership fully supports this process and is committed to meeting player expectations,” its press release said.
Cleveland published on July 4 reflecting on his time in game development, and sharing his disappointment at Krafton’s handling of Unknown Worlds and Subnautica 2. He also referenced Krafton’s intent to delay the launch.
“You can see why for Max, Ted, myself, the Unknown Worlds team, and for our community, the events of this week have been quite a shock,” Cleveland wrote. “We know that the game is ready for early access release and we know you’re ready to play it. And while we thought this was going to be our decision to make, at least for now, that decision is in Krafton’s hands. And after all these years, to find that I’m no longer able to work at the company I started stings.”
On July 9, Krafton officially of Subnautica 2 to 2026. That same day, Bloomberg published a report outlining the performance-based bonus agreement and implicitly questioning how the timing of the delay would make it difficult for the studio to hit its goals, putting the payout in jeopardy. This was the first time the details of the bonus became public.
Krafton with Engadget — and in a pop-up on — on July 10 that straight-up accused the fired leaders of abandoning the studio in favor of personal creative pursuits, specifically calling out Cleveland’s . It also threw shade at Moonbreaker and claimed the former bosses wanted the bonus payment “for themselves.”
Krafton
“Krafton made multiple requests to Charlie and Max to resume their roles as Game Director and Technical Director, respectively, but both declined to do so,” the statement said. “In particular, following the failure of Moonbreaker, Krafton asked Charlie to devote himself to the development of Subnautica 2. However, instead of participating in the game development, he chose to focus on a personal film project. Krafton believes that the absence of core leadership has resulted in repeated confusion in direction and significant delays in the overall project schedule. The current Early Access version also falls short in terms of content volume.”
That same day, Cleveland announced that he and the other ousted studio heads had against Krafton.
“Suing a multibillion dollar company in a painful, public and possibly protracted way was certainly not on my bucket list,” Cleveland wrote. “But this needs to be made right. Subnautica has been my life’s work and I would never willingly abandon it or the amazing team that has poured their hearts into it. As for the earnout, the idea that Max, Ted and I wanted to keep it all for ourselves is totally untrue.”
The lawsuit wasn’t unsealed until July 16. But on July 15, reported that Krafton now planned to extend the window for the bonus payment by an additional year, giving the studio more time to hit its goals. The publisher will also reportedly advance a portion of a separate profit-sharing bonus pool to all Unknown Worlds employees in 2025.
These moves seem designed to moot the core issues raised in the breach of contract complaint that Cleveland and other Unknown Worlds leaders filed against Krafton in Delaware Chancery Court. The lawsuit, unsealed on July 16, claims Krafton illegally fired the studio heads and delayed Subnautica 2 in order to avoid the bonus payments. It also provides a timeline of growing tensions between the founders and Krafton this year, accusing the publisher of intentional sabotage.
The lawsuit claims that Krafton and Unknown Worlds had a respectful relationship until April 2025, when Gill presented Krafton executives with the studio’s positive revenue projections, which were made with the assumption that Subnautica 2 would hit early access in 2025. He also outlined the expected bonus payout under the agreement.
“When that happened, everything changed,” the lawsuit reads.
The complaint alleges that at this point, Krafton began looking for ways to force out the leaders of Unknown Worlds and delay the launch of Subnautica 2, with a goal of circumventing the bonus payment. Cleveland, Gill and McGuire argued back and forth with Krafton executives over whether the game was ready for early access, and Krafton eventually pulled all of its resources from the studio. Krafton issued a stop order on Subnautica 2 development, took over Unknown Worlds’ communications channels and in June it started laying an internal paper trail accusing the founders of abandoning their fiduciary duties, according to the complaint.
Cleveland, Gill and McGuire were fired and removed from the Unknown Worlds board of directors on July 1. This is where the rest of us entered the story.
The main conflict here is over whether Subnautica 2 is really ready for an early access launch, and that matters because of a potential $250 million bonus payment that’s jeopardized by a delay. Not only is this a large sum for Krafton to lose, but it’s also a massive amount of money for Cleveland, Gill and McGuire to miss out on, especially now that they’ve lost their studio and tentpole IP. The ousted leaders reiterated in their lawsuit that they “planned to share even more of the earnout with their dedicated team” than they were contractually obligated to. In the complaint, they’re looking for Krafton to pay out the full bonus as projected without a delay, fulfill its obligations as a publisher and reinstate them as the heads of Unknown Worlds.
Every party in this situation claims they want what’s best for Subnautica 2 and its players. It’s possible that they’re all telling the truth and this is a simple disagreement over artistic integrity. It’s also possible that they’re all lying and everyone is looking to make (or keep) a quick buck — but man, that’s bleak. The truth, as usual, likely lies somewhere in between and, chances are, we’ll never know it. At least the court system will eventually be able to determine the second-best thing, which is who’s at fault.
Have a tip for Jessica? You can reach her by email, Bluesky or send a message to @jesscon.96 to chat confidentially on Signal.
If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission.
Like on Android, the Phone by Google app is getting a M3 Expressive redesign on Wear OS.
People are seeing an update to the in-call screen. The end call button hugs the bottom edge of the display. It’s larger than the existing circle for a bigger touch target that’s helpful on this small screen.
Similarly, the mute and three-dot overflow buttons are further up the screen, with the call duration placed in the middle on the same line.
Old
Advertisement – scroll for more content
There are similar updates when you’re dialing a number. The Google Phone Wear OS homescreen is presumably also getting M3 Expressive. This is not yet widely rolled out on watches we checked today.
New
These are modest modernizations that are inline with the in-call screen redesign on phones. The “More” menu still exists, but it’s now a list like Call Assist instead of a grid. The bigger update is the incoming call screen that lets you pick between a left/right slide or buttons to answer calls.
Some users on the beta have the Home, Keypad, and Voicemail bottom bar already, while others have the full revamp with Material 3 Expressive.
More M3 Expressive:
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.