Home Blog Page 32

Honor Magic V6 focuses on battery, not thickness [Gallery]

0


The Honor Magic V6 has arrived and, rather continuing to be obsessed with a thinner device, Honor took a new route in focusing in on a massive battery, because you’d never guess that this phone is nearing 7,000 mAh.

At first glance, the Honor Magic V6 looks a lot like the Magic V5 we just reviewed a few months ago. The core design is just about the same, as is the bulk of the spec sheet. There’s a 7.95-inch inner display, a slightly bigger 6.52-inch outer display, and a familiar 50MP + 64MP telephoto + 50MP ultra-wide camera setup. There’s, of course, the upgrade to the latest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, and also some other expected hardware improvements such as the jump to IP68/69 – just beating out Google’s Pixel 10 Pro Fold.

But what really stood out to me was the simple fact that Honor Magic V6 isn’t chasing for the thinnest possible design anymore.

The Magic V5 had already lost ground in that department, measuring 9mm while watching Samsung take the crown with its Galaxy Z Fold 7. Honor Magic V6, the company says, measures in at 9mm for its red, black, and gold color variants, with the white option apparently being 8.7mm when folded. That’s not at all “losing” the battle for thin foldables, but Honor clearly wasn’t chasing major improvements this time around. And rightly so! I love foldables and the thin form factor was a major reason I bought the Galaxy Z Fold 7, but I am very much of the opinion that most foldables are thin enough now. The race is over, and everyone won.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

But where Honor didn’t push the envelope on making the phone thinner, it did take advantage of every last bit of that space by packing an absolutely massive battery inside.

6,660 mAh.

That’s the battery capacity of the Magic V6. In a world where a ton of flagship smartphones are still barely getting over 5,000 mAh, incredible. And compared to the Galaxy Z Fold 7’s measly 4,400 mAh battery, Honor is basically pointing and laughing. That added size, of course, comes from the use of a silicon-carbon battery and it supports up to 80W fast charging, while also supporting wireless charging too.

And the battery life is predictably great. Honor Magic V6 easily powers a full day of use with no stress, which is something I’ve rarely enjoyed with book-style foldables. Of course, there are diminishing returns here given that the Magic V5 last year already had a 5,800+ mAh battery inside, but this is still a notable increase. Depending on how you use the phone, based on my very limited usage thus far (on early software), I could easily see a lot of people squeezing two days of use before needing to charge, but it’s too early to tell – this isn’t a full review, after all.

Circling back to the hardware, it really is impressive that Honor is able to manage this sort of battery capacity, and battery life, from such a thin chassis.

And a gorgeous one at that.

The red & gold colorway I’ve been using is truly stunning in person, with the faux suede leather on the back hitting that perfect level of grip.

As for the displays, Honor has been teasing this device as crease-less. Put simply, it’s not. The inner display has a crease, as every foldable today does, but it’s certainly very close to being invisible – the company specifically claims a 44% reduction in the crease.

But there are more meaningful improvements beyond that.

The inner display is now even less reflective, while a new structure for the inner display layer is supposedly more impact-resistant and overall durable. The outer display also g ets some improvements to durability with a “silicon nitride–based NanoCrystal Shield glass with up to 5,600 ultra-precise coating layers” also featuring some anti-reflective properties. Honor’s stylus works inside and out, too, and you’ll get the usual benefits of an Honor smartphone display such as 4320 Hz PWM dimming and other eye comfort tweaks.

On the software side, Honor Magic V6 ships with MagicOS 10, based on Android 16. I’m personally not a fan of all of the shoehorned-in Liquid Glass mimickry, but Honor is really trying to appeal to Apple’s ecosystem with new sharing tools that can transfer files to iPhone or Mac wirelessly (requiring an app download on the Apple product). Magic V6 can also act as a second display for a Mac, and you can mirror notifications from Honor’s phone over to an Apple Watch.

The Honor Magic V6 will be launching later this month, starting in China, with a global release over the course of the second half of 2026, “subject to each market’s timeline,” Honor says.

Other announcements at MWC 2026 for Honor include the company’s new MagicPad V4, a 12.3-inch Android tablet that takes the record for thinnest slate at just 4.8mm. The tablet is available for pre-order in the UK starting at £499.99 today, while it will be €599.99 in Europe.

More on Honor:

Follow Ben: Twitter/XThreads, Bluesky, and Instagram


Honor is sponsoring a portion of 9to5Google’s MWC 2026 travel costs, but has no input on editorial coverage.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.





Source link

The trap Anthropic built for itself

0


Friday afternoon, just as this interview was getting underway, a news alert flashed across my computer screen: the Trump administration was severing ties with Anthropic, the San Francisco AI company founded in 2021 by Dario Amodei. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth soon after invoked a national security law to blacklist the company from doing business with the Pentagon after Amodei refused to allow Anthropic’s tech to be used for mass surveillance of U.S. citizens or for autonomous armed drones that could select and kill targets without human input.

It was a jaw-dropping sequence of events. Anthropic stands to lose a contract worth up to $200 million and could be barred from working with other defense contractors after President Trump posted on Truth Social directing every federal agency to “immediately cease all use of Anthropic technology.” (Anthropic has since said it will challenge the Pentagon in court.)

Max Tegmark has spent the better part of a decade warning that the race to build ever-more-powerful AI systems is outpacing the world’s ability to govern them. The MIT physicist founded the Future of Life Institute in 2014 and in 2023 helped organize an open letter — ultimately signed by more than 33,000 people, including Elon Musk — calling for a pause in advanced AI development.

His view of the Anthropic crisis is unsparing: the company, like its rivals, has sown the seeds of its own predicament. Tegmark’s argument doesn’t begin with the Pentagon but with a decision made years earlier — a choice, shared across the industry, to resist regulation. Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind and others have long promised to govern themselves responsibly. Anthropic this week even dropped the central tenet of its own safety pledge — its promise not to release increasingly powerful AI systems until the company was confident they wouldn’t cause harm.

Now, in the absence of rules, there’s not a lot to protect these players, says Tegmark. Here’s more from that interview, edited for length and clarity. You can hear the full conversation this coming week on TechCrunch’s StrictlyVC Download podcast.

When you saw this news just now about Anthropic, what was your first reaction?

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. It’s so interesting to think back a decade ago, when people were so excited about how we were going to make artificial intelligence to cure cancer, to grow the prosperity in America and make America strong. And here we are now where the U.S. government is pissed off at this company for not wanting AI to be used for domestic mass surveillance of Americans, and also not wanting to have killer robots that can autonomously — without any human input at all — decide who gets killed.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026

Anthropic has staked its entire identity on being a safety-first AI company, and yet it was collaborating with defense and intelligence agencies [dating back to at least 2024]. Do you think that’s at all contradictory?

It is contradictory. If I can give a little cynical take on this — yes, Anthropic has been very good at marketing themselves as all about safety. But if you actually look at the facts rather than the claims, what you see is that Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind and xAI have all talked a lot about how they care about safety. None of them has come out supporting binding safety regulation the way we have in other industries. And all four of these companies have now broken their own promises. First we had Google — this big slogan, ‘Don’t be evil.’ Then they dropped that. Then they dropped another longer commitment that basically said they promised not to do harm with AI. They dropped that so they could sell AI for surveillance and weapons. OpenAI just dropped the word safety from their mission statement. xAI shut down their whole safety team. And now Anthropic, earlier in the week, dropped their most important safety commitment — the promise not to release powerful AI systems until they were sure they weren’t going to cause harm.

How did companies that made such prominent safety commitments end up in this position?

All of these companies, especially OpenAI and Google DeepMind but to some extent also Anthropic, have persistently lobbied against regulation of AI, saying, ‘Just trust us, we’re going to regulate ourselves.’ And they’ve successfully lobbied. So we right now have less regulation on AI systems in America than on sandwiches. You know, if you want to open a sandwich shop and the health inspector finds 15 rats in the kitchen, he won’t let you sell any sandwiches until you fix it. But if you say, ‘Don’t worry, I’m not going to sell sandwiches, I’m going to sell AI girlfriends for 11-year-olds, and they’ve been linked to suicides in the past, and then I’m going to release something called superintelligence which might overthrow the U.S. government, but I have a good feeling about mine’ — the inspector has to say, ‘Fine, go ahead, just don’t sell sandwiches.’

There’s food safety regulation and no AI regulation.

And this, I feel, all of these companies really share the blame for. Because if they had taken all these promises that they made back in the day for how they were going to be so safe and goody-goody, and gotten together, and then gone to the government and said, ‘Please take our voluntary commitments and turn them into U.S. law that binds even our most sloppy competitors’ — this would have happened. Instead, we’re in a complete regulatory vacuum. And we know what happens when there’s a complete corporate amnesty: you get thalidomide, you get tobacco companies pushing cigarettes on kids, you get asbestos causing lung cancer. So it’s sort of ironic that their own resistance to having laws saying what’s okay and not okay to do with AI is now coming back and biting them.

There is no law right now against building AI to kill Americans, so the government can just suddenly ask for it. If the companies themselves had earlier come out and said, ‘We want this law,’ they wouldn’t be in this pickle. They really shot themselves in the foot.

The companies’ counter-argument is always the race with China — if American companies don’t do such and such, Beijing will. Does that argument hold?

Let’s analyze that. The most common talking point from the lobbyists for the AI companies — they’re now better funded and more numerous than the lobbyists from the fossil fuel industry, the pharma industry and the military-industrial complex combined — is that whenever anyone proposes any kind of regulation, they say, ‘But China.’ So let’s look at that. China is in the process of banning AI girlfriends outright. Not just age limits — they’re looking at banning all anthropomorphic AI. Why? Not because they want to please America but because they feel this is screwing up Chinese youth and making China weak. Obviously, it’s making American youth weak, too.

And when people say we have to race to build superintelligence so we can win against China — when we don’t actually know how to control superintelligence, so that the default outcome is that humanity loses control of Earth to alien machines — guess what? The Chinese Communist Party really likes control. Who in their right mind thinks that Xi Jinping is going to tolerate some Chinese AI company building something that overthrows the Chinese government? No way. It’s clearly really bad for the American government too if it gets overthrown in a coup by the first American company to build superintelligence. This is a national security threat.

That’s compelling framing — superintelligence as a national security threat, not an asset. Do you see that view gaining traction in Washington?

I think if people in the national security community listen to Dario Amodei describe his vision — he’s given a famous speech where he says we’ll soon have a country of geniuses in a data center — they might start thinking: ‘Wait, did Dario just use the word country? Maybe I should put that country of geniuses in a data center on the same threat list I’m keeping tabs on, because that sounds threatening to the U.S. government.’ And I think fairly soon, enough people in the U.S. national security community are going to realize that uncontrollable superintelligence is a threat, not a tool. This is totally analogous to the Cold War. There was a race for dominance — economic and military — against the Soviet Union. We Americans won that one without ever engaging in the second race, which was to see who could put the most nuclear craters in the other superpower. People realized that was just suicide. No one wins. The same logic applies here.

What does all of this mean for the pace of AI development more broadly? And how close do you think we are to the systems you’re describing?

Six years ago, almost every expert in AI I knew predicted we were decades away from having AI that could master language and knowledge at human level — maybe 2040, maybe 2050. They were all wrong, because we already have that now. We’ve seen AI progress quite rapidly from high school level to college level to PhD level to university professor level in some areas. Last year, AI won the gold medal at the International Mathematics Olympiad, which is about as difficult as human tasks get. I wrote a paper together with Yoshua Bengio, Dan Hendrycks, and other top AI researchers just a few months ago giving a rigorous definition of AGI. According to this, GPT-4 was 27% of the way there. GPT-5 was 57% of the way there. So we’re not there yet, but going from 27% to 57% that quickly suggests it might not be that long.

When I lectured to my students yesterday at MIT, I told them that even if it takes four years, that means when they graduate, they might not be able to get any jobs anymore. It’s certainly not too soon to start preparing for it.

Anthropic is now blacklisted. I’m curious to see what happens next — will the other AI giants stand with it and say, ‘We won’t do this either?’ Or does someone like xAI raise their hand and say, ‘Anthropic didn’t want that contract, we’ll take it’? [Editor’s note: Hours after the interview, OpenAI announced its own deal with the Pentagon.]

Last night, Sam Altman came out and said he stands with Anthropic and has the same red lines. I admire him for the courage of saying that. Google, as of when we started this interview, had said nothing. If they just stay quiet, I think that’s incredibly embarrassing for them as a company, and a lot of their staff will feel the same. We haven’t heard anything from xAI yet either. So it’ll be interesting to see. Basically, there’s this moment where everybody has to show their true colors.

Is there a version of this where the outcome is actually good?

Yes, and this is why I’m actually optimistic in a strange way. There’s such an obvious alternative here. If we just start treating AI companies like any other companies — drop the corporate amnesty — they would clearly have to do something like a clinical trial before they released something this powerful, and demonstrate to independent experts that they know how to control it. Then we get a golden age with all the good stuff from AI, without the existential angst. That’s not the path we’re on right now. But it could be.





Source link

This retro-inspired handheld comes with Banjo-Kazooie and Battletoads built in

0


Who would’ve guessed we’d get to play the original Banjo-Kazooie on a handheld with just a D-pad in 2026. HyperMegaTech!’s latest release is a collaboration with Rare Ltd., the legendary game developer known for the Banjo-Kazooie franchise and, more recently, Sea of Thieves, called the Super Pocket Rare Edition.

The vertical handheld features 14 classics from the British developer, including two Battletoads titles, Conker’s Pocket Tales and many more. While most of the games were released on 8- or 16-bit consoles, Banjo-Kazooie will be the headliner since it was originally released on the Nintendo 64. It may sound weird to control Banjo and Kazooie with a D-pad, but HyperMegaTech! assured that the game has been enhanced and optimized specifically for the Super Pocket handheld.

Since HyperMegaTech! and Evercade share Blaze Entertainment as a parent company, that means the Rare Edition handheld will be compatible with Evercade cartridges. Once you’re done with the 14 included games, you can expand your Super Pocket’s library with cartridges that feature collections from Taito, NeoGeo or Atari. HyperMegaTech! said the Rare Edition handheld will be available for $69.99 in June 2026, but has already opened preorders.



Source link

Samsung’s Qi2 excuse on Galaxy S26 ignores the problem

0


The Galaxy S26 series doesn’t have Qi2 magnets and the official excuse for why ignores the big picture.

In a statement to 9to5Google, Samsung says that the reason the Galaxy S26 series lacks built-in Qi2 magnets is a part of the company’s “commitment to thinner, lighter designs.”

Galaxy S26 series supports Qi2-compatible phone cases, offering users flexibility without embedding the feature directly into the device. This decision reflects Samsung’s broader commitment to thinner, lighter designs, driven by advanced engineering that prioritizes compactness and portability.

Admittedly, the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s thinner hardware is pretty fantastic. I’m a big fan of how much better it feels in the hand, as it feels a bit less like the 6.9-inch behemoth that it is. But is that worth the expense of Qi2 magnets? I personally don’t think so, and I think it goes beyond personal preference.

The objective issue here is that Samsung has upgraded the wireless charging speeds of the Galaxy S26+ and Galaxy S26 Ultra, but buyers won’t be able to take advantage of that without buying a case. There’s not a single Qi2 25W charger on the market today that doesn’t use magnetic alignment because, as we previously discussed, the Qi2 spec appears to demand that.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Based on what we’ve been able to dig up, the Qi specification’s EPP (Extended Power Profile) is restricted to 15W speeds, with 25W reserved for the MPP (Magnetic Power Profile) and active alignment devices. So, with that in mind, does the Galaxy S26 Ultra require a magnetic case to achieve proper 25W speeds? As far as we can tell… yes, both by the terms of the Qi spec as well as the simple fact that there are no 25W wireless chargers without magnetic alignment. Even Samsung’s first-party 25W wireless charger… is a magnetic puck that is, at bare minimum, frustrating to use without a magnetic case.

Sure, you could buy a puck-style charger and carefully line it up to get those faster speeds, but doesn’t that sound like a horrible experience?

Building magnets into the phone itself was always the original plan for Qi2 as a whole, until “Qi2 Ready” became the official excuse to offload that to cases. But there’s an inherent problem with offloading magnets to cases instead of putting them in the phone. Not every case has magnets. Samsung upped its selection of first-party magnetic cases this year, both in terms of quality and quantity, but even Samsung sells cases that don’t have magnets. As such, the third-party market is going to be just as hit or miss.

I think it was pretty clear from early leaks that Samsung initially wanted to include Qi2 magnets natively, making it all the more of a shame that it didn’t end up happening.

The appeal of Qi2 magnets should be obvious enough. Apple has been using this tech for half a decade now, and it’s something that anyone who purchased a modern iPhone will want if they switch to another device. While Samsung is right that most people are using a case anyway, putting magnets inside of the actual phone standardizes that feature and functionality in cases, while also ensuring that everyone using the phone can use its whole suite of features.

Don’t get me wrong, I think the Galaxy S26 series looks great, and I’ve been enjoying the Ultra thus far, but I wish Samsung would reconsider this one.


The Galaxy S26 series is available for pre-order now, with Samsung’s usual pre-order perks in full swing. You’ll find boosted trade-in values and more available now through March 11, when these phones are available on store shelves. You’ll also get an additional $30 credit if you buy using our links below!


More on Samsung:

Follow Ben: Twitter/XThreads, Bluesky, and Instagram

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.





Source link

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei killed by Israel at 86 : NPR


In this 2017 photo, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, wearing a turban and traditional clothing, sits on a chair. A framed portrait of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini stands on a table on the right side of the frame.

In this 2017 photo, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, sits in a session to deliver his message for the Iranian New Year. A portrait of the late revolutionary founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, is next to him.

Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/AP

In this 2017 photo, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, wearing a turban and traditional clothing, sits on a chair. A framed portrait of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini stands on a table on the right side of the frame.

In this 2017 photo, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, sits in a session to deliver his message for the Iranian New Year. A portrait of the late revolutionary founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, is next to him.

Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/AP

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed in Israeli attacks, with U.S. support, on Saturday. He was 86 years old.

President Trump announced the Iranian leader’s death on social media, saying Khamenei could not avoid U.S. intelligence and surveillance. A source briefed on the U.S.-Israeli attacks on Iran told NPR earlier Saturday that an Israeli airstrike killed Khamenei.

During his 36-year rule, Khamenei was unwavering in his steadfast antipathy to the U.S. and Israel and to any efforts to reform and bring Iran into the 21st century.

Khamenei was born in July 1939 into a religious family in the Shia Muslim holy city of Mashhad in northeastern Iran and attended theological school. An outspoken opponent of the U.S.-backed Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Khamenei was arrested several times.

He was surrounded by other Iranian activists, including Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who became Iran’s first supreme leader following the country’s Islamic Revolution in the late 1970s.

Khamenei survived an assassination attempt in 1981 that cost him the use of his right arm. He served as Iran’s president before succeeding Khomeini as supreme leader in 1989.

Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute in Washington, D.C., says Khamenei was an unlikely candidate. Then a midlevel cleric, Khamenei lacked religious credentials, which left him feeling vulnerable, Vatanka says.

“He knew himself. He didn’t have the prestige, the gravitas to be … the successor to the founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Khomeini,” he says.

In 2005, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (center), newly elected President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (right), outgoing President Mohammad Khatami and former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani attend Ahmadinejad's inaugural ceremony in Tehran.

In 2005, Ali Khamenei (center), newly elected President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (right), outgoing President Mohammad Khatami and former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani attend Ahmadinejad’s inaugural ceremony in Tehran.

Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images

In 2005, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (center), newly elected President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (right), outgoing President Mohammad Khatami and former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani attend Ahmadinejad's inaugural ceremony in Tehran.

In 2005, Ali Khamenei (center), newly elected President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (right), outgoing President Mohammad Khatami and former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani attend Ahmadinejad’s inaugural ceremony in Tehran.

Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images

“He spent the first few years in power being very nervous,” says Vatanka. “He really literally felt that somebody is going to, you know, take him down from the position of power.”

But Khamenei was cunning and able to outwit other senior political figures in the Islamic Republic, according to Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group. He says that with the help of the formidable Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Khamenei built up his power base to become the longest-serving leader in the Middle East.

“Ayatollah Khamenei was a man with strategic patience and was able to calculate a few steps ahead,” he says. “That’s why I think he managed — on the back of the Revolutionary Guards — to increasingly appropriate all the levers of power in his hands and sideline everyone else.”

Khamenei’s close ties to the Revolutionary Guards allowed Iran’s military to develop a vast commercial empire in control of many parts of the economy, while ordinary Iranians struggled to get by.

In this black-and-white photo from 1981, Ali Khamenei (on the right side of the frame) speaks to members of Iran's armed forces, who are wearing helmets and are seated or crouched in rows on the ground on the left side of the frame.

Ali Khamenei (right) speaks to members of the armed forces of the Islamic Republic during the Iran-Iraq War on Oct. 4, 1981.

AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

AFP/Getty Images

In this black-and-white photo from 1981, Ali Khamenei (on the right side of the frame) speaks to members of Iran's armed forces, who are wearing helmets and are seated or crouched in rows on the ground on the left side of the frame.

Ali Khamenei (right) speaks to members of the armed forces of the Islamic Republic during the Iran-Iraq War on Oct. 4, 1981.

AFP/Getty Images

Vaez says Khamenei also began to build up Iran’s defensive policies, such as developing proxies like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Gaza Strip to deter a direct attack on Iranian soil.

“And then also becoming self-reliant in developing a viable conventional deterrence, which took the form of Iran’s ballistic missile program,” Vaez says.

As supreme leader, Khamenei also had the final word on anything to do with Iran’s nuclear program.

Over time, Khamenei increasingly injected himself into politics. Such was the case in 2009, when he intervened in the presidential election to ensure that his favored candidate, the controversial conservative Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, won office.

Iranians took to the streets to protest what was widely seen as a fraudulent election. Khamenei brutally crushed those demonstrations, triggering both a backlash and more protest movements over the years.

Iran killed thousands of its citizens under Khamenei’s rule, including more than 7,000 people killed during weeks of mass protests that started in late December 2025, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency, a U.S.-based organization that closely tracks rights abuses in Iran.

Kneeling on the floor, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (center), prays with the Iranian president and other government officials, who are kneeling in rows behind him.

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (center), prays with the Iranian president and other government officials in Tehran in 2014.

Anadolu Agency/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Kneeling on the floor, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (center), prays with the Iranian president and other government officials, who are kneeling in rows behind him.

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (center), prays with the Iranian president and other government officials in Tehran in 2014.

Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

“Khamenei had always supported and endorsed repressive government crackdown, recognizing that these protests were damaging to the stability and legitimacy of the state,” says Sanam Vakil, an Iran expert at Chatham House, a London-based think tank.

But Khamenei was unconcerned about getting to the root of the protests, says the Middle East Institute’s Vatanka, and remained stuck in an Islamic revolutionary mindset against the West.

“He on so many occasions refused point-blank to accept the basic reality that where he was in terms of his worldview was not where the rest of his people were,” Vatanka says.

He adds that 75% of Iran’s 90 million people were born after the revolution and have watched other countries in the region modernize and integrate with the international community.

“The 75% he should have catered to, listened to and address[ed] policies to satisfy their aspirations,” he says. “He failed in that miserably.”

Emerging through a pair of teal curtains, Ali Khamenei wears a mask due to the COVID-19 pandemic as he arrives to cast his ballot during Iran's presidential election on June 18, 2021.

Ali Khamenei wears a mask due to the COVID-19 pandemic as he arrives to cast his ballot during Iran’s presidential election on June 18, 2021.

Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images

Emerging through a pair of teal curtains, Ali Khamenei wears a mask due to the COVID-19 pandemic as he arrives to cast his ballot during Iran's presidential election on June 18, 2021.

Ali Khamenei wears a mask due to the COVID-19 pandemic as he arrives to cast his ballot during Iran’s presidential election on June 18, 2021.

Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images

The International Crisis Group’s Vaez says after the Arab Spring uprisings in 2011, Khamenei did start worrying about the survival of his regime. Iran’s economy was crumbling, due in large part to stringent Western sanctions, fueling more unrest.

In 2013, Khamenei agreed to secret negotiations with the U.S. about Iran’s nuclear program, which eventually led to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear agreement. Vaez says Khamenei deeply distrusted the U.S. and was skeptical about the deal.

“His argument has always been that the U.S. is always looking for pretexts, for putting pressure on Iran,” he says. “And if Iran concedes on the nuclear issue, then the U.S. would put pressure on Iran because of its missiles program or because of human rights violations or because of its regional policies.”

President Trump’s withdrawal from the nuclear deal during his first term in office gave some credence to Khamenei’s cynicism. Analysts say Iran increased its nuclear enrichment after that to a point where it was close to being able to build a bomb.

In early 2025, when Trump reached out to Iran about a new deal, Khamenei dragged out negotiations until they began in mid-April.

But time ran out. In June, Israel made good on its threat to neutralize Iran’s nuclear program, launching strikes on key facilities and killing scientists and generals. Iran retaliated, and the two sides exchanged several days of missile strikes.

On June 21, 2025, the U.S. launched major airstrikes on three of Iran’s nuclear enrichment sites. Trump said the facilities had been “completely and totally obliterated,” although there was debate among the White House and nuclear experts as to how serious Iran’s nuclear program had been set back.

Vakil, of Chatham House, says Khamenei underestimated what Israel and the U.S. would do.

“I think that Khamenei always assumed that he could play for time, and what he really didn’t understand is that the world around Iran had very much changed,” she says. “The world had tired of Khamenei and Iranian foot-dragging and antics … and so that was a miscalculation.”

But it was Iran’s use of proxy militias across the region that eventually led to Khamenei’s downfall.

When Hamas — the Palestinian Islamist group backed by Iran — attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing nearly 1,200 people and kidnapping 251 others, it triggered a cascade of events that ultimately led to Israel’s attack on Iran. 

The day after the 2023 Hamas-led attack, Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon started firing rockets into Israel, triggering a conflict that led to the Shia militia’s top brass being decimated — including top leader Hassan Nasrallah.

Israel and Iran traded direct airstrikes for the first time in 2024 as part of that conflict.

Israel’s bombing of Iranian weapons shipments in Syria also helped weaken the regime of Syria’s then-dictator, Bashar al-Assad, an important ally of Iran. Assad fell in December 2024 and fled to Russia in early January 2025.

By the time Khamenei died, his legacy was in tatters. Israel had hobbled two key proxies, Hamas and Hezbollah, and had wiped out Iran’s air defenses. With U.S. help, it left Iran’s nuclear program in shambles.

What remains is a robust ballistic missile program, the brainchild of Khamenei. It’s unclear who will replace him to lead a now weakened and vulnerable Iran.



Source link

Why did Netflix back down from its deal to acquire Warner Bros.?

0


Netflix stunned the entertainment world this week when it declined to raise its bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, setting the stage for Paramount Skydance to win ownership of the Hollywood studio.

At the time, Netflix co-CEOs Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters said they were being financially disciplined. Now reporting in Bloomberg offers more details about why Netflix executives backed down from a bidding war that it seemed to win back in December

For one thing, the streaming giant’s shareholders appeared deeply skeptical that the acquisition was a good deal — Netflix’s share price declined 30% since announcing the deal, while the subsequent news that it was backing down sent Netflix stock up nearly 14%.

For another, Netflix’s commitment to the deal reportedly wavered after Paramount came in with an increased offer and seemed willing to go several more rounds in a bidding war.

By the time Sarandos met with Trump administration officials on Thursday, he may already have decided to concede. In fact, since President Donald Trump had previously warned him not to overpay, Sarandos reportedly told him, “I took your advice.”

Meanwhile, employees at Warner Bros. now worry about major studio layoffs and conservative political pressure on CNN.



Source link

The new Leica Leitzphone by Xiaomi, Honor’s ultra-thin MagicPad 4 and more

0


MWC 2026 officially gets underway on March 2 and will continue through March 5, but the announcements are already coming ahead of its start. We can always count on the annual tech event to bring tons of new phones, laptops and tablets, and we’re expecting to see some robots and other gadgets too — plus plenty of AI news, of course. In addition to the announcements, MWC is our chance to get hands-on time with some of the most interesting new devices, like the Xiaomi 17 Ultra.

Engadget’s Mat Smith is on the ground in Barcelona, and we’ll be updating this story as the week goes on to keep you in the loop on everything that caught our attention. Keep checking back here for the latest MWC news.

Xiaomi x Leica

Mat Smith for Engadget

Xiaomi kicked off MWC this year by announcing the global launch of its 17 Ultra smartphone, which debuted first in China back in December. It’s unclear if the phone will ever come to the US, but it’s now rolling out in Europe. Xiaomi teamed up again with Leica to make a photography-focused smartphone, and the 17 Ultra sports a 1-inch 50-megapixel camera sensor with a f/1.67 lens, a telephoto setup with a 200MP 1/1.4-inch sensor, and a 50MP ultrawide camera. There’s also a manual zoom ring around the camera.

Check out our hands on for our first impressions of what it’s like shooting with the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. And there’s more to it than just the camera. The 17 Ultra has a 6.9-inch OLED 120 Hz display that peaks at 3,500 nits of brightness, and a 6000mAh silicon-carbon battery. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra starts at £1,299 (roughly $1,750).

Leica also announced a new phone made in partnership with Xiaomi at MWC. It looks a whole lot like Xiaomi’s 17 Ultra, but isn’t the 17 Ultra, exactly.

Leica Leitzphone by Xiaomi hands-on at MWC 2026§

Leica Leitzphone by Xiaomi hands-on at MWC 2026 (Image by Mat Smith for Engadget)

Like the 17 Ultra, Leica’s Leitzphone by Xiaomi has a 1-inch camera sensor and physical controls for zoom and other settings, using a mechanical ring around the camera unit. It features a Leica-designed intuitive camera interface with the option to show just the essentials when you’re shooting, hiding all the modes and labels. There’s a monochrome shooting mode and Leica filters.

The Leica branding is splashed all over it in design and wallpapers, but it’s otherwise pretty similar to the 17 Ultra, with the same specs. Like the 17 Ultra, it has a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chip and a 6.9-inch 120Hz display. This one’s priced at €1,999 (roughly $2,362).

The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro

The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Xiaomi)

In addition to the 17 Ultra, Xiaomi announced two new tablets at MWC this year: the Xiaomi Pad 8 and Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro. There’s nothing revolutionary here, but they’re lightweight and thin, with both being 5.75mm thick and weighing 485g, and have a 9200mAh battery. The Pro model is powered by a Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, while the regular Pad 8 uses the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset.

Xiaomi also unveiled a new 5000mAh powerbank, the UltraThin Magnetic Power Bank 5000 15W. The 6mm thick power bank comes in three colors with an aluminum alloy shell: orange, silver and charcoal gray. Along with that, the company introduced the Xiaomi Tag, its own take on the Bluetooth item tracker. The Xiaomi Tag has a built-in hanging loop so it can be attached directly to a keyring, and the company says it will work with both Apple Find My and Google’s Find Hub for Android.

Honor MagicPad 4

Honor

Ahead of MWC, Honor announced what it claims is the thinnest Android tablet in the world: the 4.8mm thick MagicPad 4. We’re expecting to hear more about this at Honor’s press conference on Sunday, but so far we know it features a 12.3-inch 165Hz OLED display and weighs just 450g. It comes with up to 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage, and is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chipset. The thinness doesn’t count the camera bump, Honor notes. The MagicPad 4 has 13MP rear and 9MP front cameras. It also boasts spatial audio, with eight speakers.

Just as the display is slightly smaller than the previous MagicPad, the MagicPad 4 has a smaller battery at 10100 mAh. It comes with a 66W fast charger. The MagicPad 4 will run Honor’s MagicOS 10. We don’t yet know how much it will cost, but we’ll update this after Honor’s press conference (where we’re also expecting to see the company’s robot) with any new details.

Tecno

Tecno

We can always expect to see some wild phone concepts at MWC, and this year we’re starting with one from Tecno. The company unveiled a modular concept smartphone design that can be as thin as 4.9mm in its base configuration. There’d be 10 modules to choose from based on the announcement, including various camera lenses, a gaming attachment and a power bank, relying on magnets to keep it all together — or Modular Magnetic Interconnection Technology, as Tecno is calling it.



Source link

Xiaomi 17 launches globally alongside new Wear OS watch, more

0


Xiaomi is kicking off MWC 2026 with the global debut of the Xiaomi 17 series, as well as a new Wear OS smartwatch and its first Find Hub tracker, among other things.

The Xiaomi 17 series launched in China last year as some of the first Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5-powered Android flagships, and now they’re on their way to global markets. This includes most of Europe, where Xiaomi 17 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra will be available starting at €999 and €1,499, respectively.

Both phones are powered by Qualcomm’s latest, with the base Xiaomi 17 offering a 6.3-inch LTPO OLED display, 12GB/16GB of RAM and 256GB/512GB of storage, and a 6,330 mAh battery. But the star of the show this week is the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, where the company touts new camera upgrades such as a new optical zoom telephoto camera.

Xiaomi says:

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Xiaomi 17 Ultra breaks new ground with Xiaomi’s first 1″ LOFIC main camera sensor. The Light Fusion 1050L image sensor uses cutting-edge capacitor technology to significantly increase full-well capacity and enable next-generation HDR performance. Another key breakthrough is the Leica 200MP 75–100mm camera, featuring a 75–100mm mechanical optical zoom. Built to Leica APO optical references, the telephoto camera maintains high image quality with minimal ghosting and colour fringing across the entire zoom range, and expands to a 400mm (17.2x) equivalent focal length thanks to advanced sensor technology for outstanding long-range photography.

The Ultra’s camera setup includes a 50MP main sensor, a 200MP sensor behind that new telephoto lens, a 50MP ultrawide camera, and a 50MP front-facing camera. It also has a 6.9-inch display, up to 1TB of storage, a 6,000 mAh battery with up to 90W charging.

But new phones aren’t all Xiaomi has launching globally.

The new Xiaomi Pad 8 series delivers an 11.2-inch display, Snapdragon 8 Elite, a 9,200 mAh battery, all wrapped up in a 5.75mm design and starting at €449.99.

There’s also the launch of the Xiaomi Tag, the company’s first tracker for Android Find Hub which, like many others, doubles as a tracker for use in Apple’s Find My network. It costs €14.99.

Rounding out the announcements, there’s the new Xiaomi Watch 5 powered by Wear OS 6. The new smartwatch has a huge 930 mAh silicon-carbon battery packed inside, uses Snapdragon W5 Gen 1, and supports added wrist gestures.

Xiaomi says:

Through 2 general gestures (Pinch Twice and Rub Twice) and 3 customized gestures (Snap Fingers, Shake Wrist, and Rotate Wrist), users can dismiss calls, silence alarms, launch workouts, remotly control camera for photos and recordings,⁸ or access compatible Google apps such as Google Gemini, Google Wallet, and YouTube Music,⁶ delivering a more fluid and hands-free experience throughout the day.

Xiaomi Watch 5 starts at €299.99.

There are a few other products too, including REDMI Buds 8 Pro, a new 15W 5,000 mAh ultra-thin magnetic power bank, and a new series of electric scooters.


Follow Ben: Twitter/XThreads, Bluesky, and Instagram

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.





Source link

India disrupts access to popular developer platform Supabase with blocking order

0


Supabase, a popular developer database platform, is facing disruptions in India — one of its key markets — has been blocked in India, TechCrunch has learned. New Delhi ordered internet providers to block its website, resulting in patchy access across networks.

The blocking order was issued on February 24 under Section 69A of India’s Information Technology Act, according to a source familiar with the matter. The provision empowers the government to restrict public access to online content.

The Indian government did not publicly cite a reason for the move, and it was not immediately clear whether the action was linked to a cybersecurity concern, copyright complaint, or another issue. It was also unclear how long the restrictions would remain in place.

Access to Supabase has been inconsistent in India over the past several days, with the San Francisco-based company acknowledging the issue in posts on social media starting Wednesday. While the restrictions were first reported by Supabase on Reliance Industries’ JioFiber network, users have since flagged similar problems across multiple internet providers and telecom networks. In one post on Friday, Supabase tagged India’s IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, asking him to intervene and restore access, though the company later removed the message and said in a subsequent update that the site remained blocked for many users in the country.

An Indian founder, who asked not to be named to avoid potential repercussions, told TechCrunch they had stopped seeing new user sign-ups from India over the past two to three days. A technology consultant working with local startups, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said they were unable to reliably access Supabase for both development and production purposes.

While Supabase suggested workarounds such as switching DNS settings or using a VPN (which reroute internet traffic to bypass local restrictions), the founder said such steps were not practical for most end users.

At the time of publication, TechCrunch was able to verify that supabase.co remained inaccessible on ACT Fibernet, JioFiber and Airtel connections in New Delhi. However, two users on ACT Fibernet in Bengaluru said they were still able to access the service, suggesting the restrictions may be unevenly implemented.

Techcrunch event

Boston, MA
|
June 9, 2026

A screenshot showing Supabase’s access blocked on ACT FibernetImage Credits:Screenshot / Jagmeet Singh / TechCrunch

Notably, Supabase’s main website remained accessible in India — but its underlying developer infrastructure did not.

India is Supabase’s fourth-largest source of traffic, accounting for about 9% of global visits, according to data from Similarweb, highlighting the potential fallout for the country’s developer ecosystem. The platform’s global traffic jumped more than 111% year over year to about 4.2 million visits in January. In India, visits rose roughly 179% to about 365,000, compared with a 168.5% increase in the U.S. to about 627,000.

The incident highlights broader concerns about India’s website blocking regime, said Raman Jit Singh Chima, Asia Pacific policy director at Access Now.

“This is a simple fact that has grave consequences for developers and others,” he told TechCrunch. “You don’t know where you can safely run projects without the danger that something might happen where it gets blocked, and suddenly you’re scrambling to find a way.”

India has previously faced criticism over broad website blocking measures. In 2014, authorities briefly restricted access to developer platform GitHub, along with services such as Vimeo, Pastebin and Weebly, during a security probe. Users on some Indian networks in 2023 also reported that a key GitHub content domain had been blocked by certain ISPs, according to earlier reports.

Founded in 2020 by CEO Paul Copplestone and CTO Ant Wilson, Supabase positions itself as an open-source alternative to Firebase built on PostgreSQL. The startup has gained traction amid rising interest in so-called “vibe coding” tools and AI-driven app development, and has raised about $380 million across three funding rounds since September 2024, lifting its valuation to $5 billion.

India’s Ministry of Electronics and IT, as well as telecom providers including ACT Fibernet, Bharti Airtel, and Reliance Jio, did not respond to requests for comment. Copplestone and Wilson also did not respond.





Source link

OpenAI strikes a deal with the Defense Department to deploy its AI models

0


OpenAI has reached an agreement with the Defense Department to deploy its models in the agency’s network, company chief Sam Altman has revealed on X. In his post, he said two of OpenAI’s most important safety principles are “prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems.” Altman claimed the company put those principles in its agreement with the agency, which he called by the government’s preferred name of Department of War (DoW), and that it had agreed to honor them.

The agency has closed the deal with OpenAI, shortly after President Donald Trump ordered all government agencies to stop using Claude and any other Anthropic services. If you’ll recall, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth previously threatened to label Anthropic “supply chain risk” if it continues refusing to remove the guardrails on its AI, which are preventing the technology to be used for mass surveillance against Americans and in fully autonomous weapons.

It’s unclear why the government agreed to team up with OpenAI if its models also have the same guardrails, but Altman said it’s asking the government to offer the same terms to all the AI companies it works with. Jeremy Lewin, the Senior Official Under Secretary for Foreign Assistance, Humanitarian Affairs, and Religious Freedom, said on X that DoW “references certain existing legal authorities and includes certain mutually agreed upon safety mechanisms” in its contracts. Both OpenAI and xAI, which had also previously signed a deal to deploy Grok in the DoW’s classified systems, agreed to those terms. He said it was the same “compromise that Anthropic was offered, and rejected.”

Anthropic, which started working with the US government in 2024, refused to bow down to Hegseth. In its latest statement, published just hours before Altman announced OpenAI’s agreement, it repeated its stance. “No amount of intimidation or punishment from the Department of War will change our position on mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weapons,” Anthropic wrote. “We will challenge any supply chain risk designation in court.”

Altman added in his post on X that OpenAI will build technical safeguards to ensure the company’s models behave as they should, claiming that’s also what the DoW wanted. It’s sending engineers to work with the agency to “ensure [its models’] safety,” and it will only deploy on cloud networks. As The New York Times notes, OpenAI is not yet on Amazon cloud, which the government uses. But that could change soon, as company has also just announced forming a partnership with Amazon to run its models on Amazon Web Services (AWS) for enterprise customers.



Source link