Home Blog Page 351

White House-Amazon Spat Culminates in Trump Calling Bezos ‘Very Nice’

0


President Trump’s 100th day in office started with what seemed to be a fresh and fast-escalating spat between the White House and Amazon.

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, came out swinging in her press briefing on Tuesday morning, accusing Amazon of being “hostile and political” after a report — disputed by the company — from Punchbowl News saying that the online retail giant would start displaying the exact cost of tariff-related price increases alongside all its products.

Displaying the import fees would have made clear to American consumers that they were shouldering the costs of Mr. Trump’s tariff policies rather than China, as he and his top officials have often claimed would be the case.

After the report was published, Mr. Trump spoke about it over the phone with Jeff Bezos, Amazon’s founder, according to three people familiar with the exchange. Amazon spokesmen hurriedly issued denials that the policy was going into effect, and by Tuesday afternoon Mr. Trump was back to praising Mr. Bezos.

“Jeff Bezos is very nice,” Mr. Trump said to reporters as he embarked on a trip to Michigan for a rally commemorating the first 100 days of his second term. “He solved the problem very quickly. He did the right thing. Good guy.”

This arc between Mr. Trump and Mr. Bezos that played out over just a few hours seemed telling. The Amazon mogul is among the billionaires who have gone to ever new lengths to get in good with this White House. Mr. Trump, in turn, has managed to woo such billionaires by promising he’d be better for business. And yet, at the first sign that Mr. Bezos might be prioritizing his businesses interests in a way that would harm Mr. Trump’s political fortunes, the White House didn’t hesitate to lash out publicly.

And it seemed to have had the desired affect.

Ms. Leavitt had ripped into Amazon on Tuesday morning while standing beside Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. She said that she had just been talking on the phone with the president about the Punchbowl report, and she also asked aloud in her briefing why Amazon hadn’t done such a thing when prices increased during the Biden administration because of inflation.

Ms. Leavitt said it was “not a surprise” coming from Amazon, as she held up a copy of a 2021 article from Reuters with the headline “Amazon partnered with China propaganda arm.”

Afterward, an Amazon spokesman said the company had considered an idea similar to the one in the Punchbowl report, but only on a new, experimental part of its site, Amazon Haul, which competes with Temu, a Chinese retailer. Temu primarily ships directly to consumers and has begun displaying “import charges” to reflect the end of a customs loophole that had exempted low-priced items from tariffs.

“Teams discuss ideas all the time,” the spokesman, Ty Rogers, said in a statement. He said the concept was never under consideration for the main Amazon site, adding: “This was never approved and is not going to happen.”

The commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, wrote on social media that this was “Good news.”

Mr. Trump’s aggressive tariffs on Chinese goods have kicked off an escalating trade war, even as his administration has backed off its broader global levies amid what it said were negotiations with dozens of nations on new trade deals.

Ms. Leavitt’s attack on Amazon was all the more noteworthy because Mr. Bezos has lately gone to great lengths to curry favor with this White House. Amazon donated $1 million to Mr. Trump’s inaugural fund, securing seats for Mr. Bezos and his bride-to-be in the Capitol Rotunda for the inauguration.

Shortly before the election, Mr. Bezos quashed an editorial endorsing Kamala Harris for president in the newspaper he owns, The Washington Post. More recently, Amazon Prime added multiple seasons of “The Apprentice” to its streaming inventory. The company also cut a deal with the Trump family to make a documentary about Melania Trump.

In December, Mr. Bezos explained his Trump-ward turn while speaking at The New York Times’s DealBook Summit. “What I’ve seen so far is he is calmer than he was the first time,” Mr. Bezos said of Mr. Trump, “more confident, more settled.”

He added, “I’m very hopeful. He seems to have a lot of energy around reducing regulation.”

Mr. Trump was asked about his relationship with Mr. Bezos in a cover story in The Atlantic magazine published Monday. “He’s 100 percent,” Mr. Trump said. “He’s been great.”

But when Ms. Leavitt was asked Tuesday morning whether the Amazon mogul could still be considered a Trump supporter, given the latest report, she demurred.

“Look, I will not speak to the president’s relationships with Jeff Bezos,” Ms. Leavitt said, “but I will tell you that this is certainly a hostile and political action by Amazon.”



Source link

U.K. Crossbow Attack Suspect Voiced Racist and Misogynist Views

0


A man accused of wounding two women with a crossbow in the British city of Leeds on Saturday has died of a self-inflicted injury, the police said on Tuesday.

The suspect, Owen Lawrence, 38, died in the hospital where he was taken after his arrest at the scene of the attack, the counterterrorism police said in a statement.

The two women, ages 19 and 31, were seriously injured, the authorities said. One was released from the hospital a day after the attack, but the other remained hospitalized on Tuesday after undergoing surgery for life-threatening wounds, they said.

The police said they were still investigating the motivation for the rampage, during which witnesses saw the suspect walking along a three-mile stretch of pubs and bars, known locally as the “Otley Run,” armed with a crossbow and several air rifles.

The attack appeared to be the latest in a series of violent incidents in Britain in recent years by individuals appearing to harbor a complex mix of motivations. Some showed an interest in extremist content online, though they did not adhere to a single ideology.

Last summer, three young girls were brutally murdered in a stabbing attack by a violence-obsessed teenager in Southport. A prosecutor said in court that the suspect had no political or religious ideology and that his “only purpose was to kill.” The young man had viewed a large quantity of videos and material relating to mass murder, violence and genocide, the authorities say.

Experts in radicalization have warned of a rise in indiscriminate acts of violence of a sort once mostly associated with ideologically driven terrorists.

A social media account associated with the suspect in the Leeds attack on the weekend indicated an interest in mass shootings and in white supremacy, and voiced misogynistic views.

The authorities have not yet decided whether to formally declare the incident a terrorist attack. Under British law, that would require a finding that the violence have been waged “for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.”

Investigators are reviewing two Facebook accounts that the police believe belonged to the suspect. One of the accounts was viewed by The New York Times before it was taken down.

The most recent post, published shortly before the attack began at 2:45 p.m. on Saturday, was titled “attack information” and contained photos of weapons that matched images of items discarded on the ground following the assault. It said the targets would be “students, night club goers, pub crawlers, Otley Run participants, society, humanity, humanitarian race, neurotypicals and police, if I need to.”

Under the heading “attack type,” the post said it was a “spree killing, mass murder, terrorism, revenge, misogynistic rage, homicide/suicide.”

The Facebook user said he was a political “reactionary” who had “explored far right ideas” and had read a notorious manifesto shared by the white supremacist who carried out mass shootings at two New Zealand mosques in 2019. A separate post referred to “the great replacement,” a far-right conspiracy theory that white people are being replaced by nonwhites in Western countries.

Another recurring theme on the account was a hatred of women, feminists and the political left. A Feb. 15 post accused women of causing society to “degenerate” by choosing the wrong partners. A week later, another post claimed that dating apps like Tinder were “designed for women only.”

The Facebook account had been made public before the attack and the profile picture showed a man believed to be the suspect holding a baseball bat and wearing a T-shirt similar to one worn by one of the perpetrators of the 1999 Columbine High School massacre.

Mass shootings in America also drew attention on the account.

In 2024 the user shared a video relating to a 2017 gunman at a supermarket in Pennsylvania, with the caption: “R.I.P. brother, identified with you a lot.”

Other attacks discussed on the Facebook page included one targeting Jews and Muslims in Germany in 2019 and the 2011 Norway massacre by the white supremacist Anders Breivik.

Several posts alluded to the Crusades, using the Latin phrase “Deus vult” — “God wills it” — which was used by Christian armies and has since been adopted by far-right groups. In November 2023, the man posted a photo of himself performing what appears to be a Nazi salute.

But on Feb. 20 this year, the same account wrote that he did not identify with far-right ideologies and had only “flirted with their ideas a bit.”

Several other posts account made reference to health and well-being, saying he was a recovering drug addict who attended Narcotics Anonymous meetings.



Source link

Supreme Court Considers Suit Over F.B.I.’s Raid of the Wrong House

0


Very early on a fall morning in 2017, F.B.I. agents knocked down the front door of a home in Atlanta with a battering ram. Guns drawn, they set off a flash-bang grenade and charged inside.

The couple who lived there, Hilliard Toi Cliatt and Curtrina Martin, barricaded themselves in a closet. The agents dragged Mr. Cliatt out at gunpoint and handcuffed him. They told Ms. Martin to keep her hands up as she pleaded to see her 7-year-old son, who had been asleep in another room.

As they questioned Mr. Cliatt, he gave his address. It was different from the one the agents had a warrant to enter.

One of the agents, Lawrence Guerra, had earlier identified the correct house, which he said looked similar and was nearby, on a different street. He said he had been misdirected on the morning of the raid by his GPS device.

The couple sued for false arrest, false imprisonment, assault, battery and other claims but lost in the lower courts on a variety of grounds, notably that government officials’ actions are protected from lawsuits when they perform a duty that involves discretion.

The legal questions in the case were a tangled series of exceptions and provisos involving the Federal Tort Claims Act, which only sometimes allows suits against the government notwithstanding the doctrine of sovereign immunity.

Much of the argument was technical, and the court seemed headed for a modest ruling that would send the case back to the lower courts for further consideration.

But several justices seemed incredulous when Frederick Liu, a lawyer for the federal government, said the raid did not violate any policy.

“No policy says don’t break down the wrong door?” Justice Neal M. Gorsuch asked. “Don’t traumatize the occupants? Really?”

Mr. Liu clarified his position. “It’s the United States’ policy to execute the warrants at the right house,” he said.

“I should hope so,” Justice Gorsuch responded.

Mr. Liu nonetheless said that the agents’ discretion in planning the raid was “filled with policy considerations” including “weighing public safety considerations, efficiency considerations, operational security.”

The plaintiffs sought to second-guess those judgments, he said, by saying, for example, that the agents should have checked the house number.

Justice Gorsuch said, “Yeah, you might look at the address of the house before you have knocked down the door.”

But Mr. Liu said that “checking the house number at the end of the driveway means exposing the agents to potential lines of fire.”

Justice Gorsuch continued. “How about making sure you’re on the right street?” he asked. “Checking a street sign — is that asking too much?”

Mr. Liu said the agents had made a “reasonable mistake.” He added that a 1974 amendment to the Federal Tort Claims Act seeking to make it easier to sue over wrong-house raids after notorious ones in Collinsville, Ill., did not apply to the one in Atlanta.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor was unpersuaded. “That is so ridiculous,” she said. “Congress is looking at the Collinsville raid and providing a remedy to people who have been wrongfully raided, and you’re now saying, ‘no, they really didn’t want to protect them fully.’”

Patrick M. Jaicomo, a lawyer with the Institute for Justice, which represents the plaintiffs in the case, Martin v. United States, No. 24-362, said “there’s no question that there was no policy here.”

“As my friend said,” he added, referring to Mr. Liu, “the government’s policy is to raid the right house. They didn’t do that. The preparation is kind of immaterial to the ultimate result here. If you really, really meant to drop the pizza off at the right address, it doesn’t matter. You still need to give a refund if you drop it off at the wrong address.”



Source link

Sky Sports | Sports News

0



Make sure the URL in the address bar contains no capital letters or spaces and please check your bookmarks.

Popular Links





Source link

Trump Administration Live Updates: President Signs Orders Ramping Up Immigration Crackdown

0


President Trump signed three more executive orders on Monday, including one targeting local jurisdictions that the administration says are not cooperating with its aggressive immigration crackdown.

One order directs Pam Bondi, the attorney general, and Kristi Noem, the secretary of homeland security, to publish a list of state and local jurisdictions that the Trump administration considers “sanctuary cities,” meaning they limit or refuse to cooperate with federal officials’ efforts to arrest undocumented immigrants. It calls for pursuing “all necessary legal remedies and enforcement measures” against jurisdictions that continue to oppose the administration’s immigration crackdown.

A second order instructs the Trump administration to provide legal resources to police officers accused of wrongdoing; review and attempt to modify existing restraints on law enforcement, such as federal consent decrees; provide military equipment to local law enforcement; and use enforcement measures against local officials who “unlawfully prohibiting law enforcement officers from carrying out duties.”

Earlier in the day, Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said the order would “unleash America’s law enforcement to pursue criminals.”

A third executive order seeks to enforce existing rules requiring professional truck drivers to be proficient in English. The order requires the Transportation Department to place any driver who cannot speak and read English “out of service.”

“Proficiency in English,” Mr. Trump’s order states, “should be a non-negotiable safety requirement for professional drivers.”

One of the orders also could hinder undocumented immigrants from getting in-state tuition for higher education. It directed federal agencies to stop the enforcement of state and local laws “that provide in-state higher education tuition to aliens but not to out-of-state American citizens.”

The orders represent Mr. Trump’s latest salvo against so-called sanctuary cities. As the president attempts to increase the pace of deportations, his administration has grown increasingly frustrated that some jurisdictions will not hold migrants in jail beyond their release dates to make it easier for federal officials to detain them.

Mr. Trump’s immigration crackdown has prompted significant outcry.

“Let’s be clear: Trump continues to position his anti-immigrant agenda at the very center of his action,” said Hector Sanchez Barba, the president of Mi Familia Vota, a pro-immigration advocacy organization. “Trump’s inhumane attacks on law-abiding, tax-paying immigrants are both morally repugnant and deeply unpopular with the American people. We know this because in just four months, Trump has reached historically low levels of unpopularity with voters.”

The Trump administration has already sued the city of Rochester, N.Y., accusing officials there of illegally impeding immigration enforcement. And the Justice Department is prosecuting a Milwaukee judge on charges of obstructing immigration agents.

Rochester’s mayor, Malik D. Evans, and City Council president, Miguel Meléndez, released a joint statement on Friday criticizing the lawsuit.

“On its face, the complaint is an exercise in political theater, not legal practice,” the statement said, adding, “The City of Rochester is committed to investing its resources on public safety for all, not doing the federal government’s work of immigration enforcement.”

Meanwhile, a federal judge in San Francisco temporarily blocked the government from enforcing part of an executive order directing agencies to withhold funds from cities and counties that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement.

“It’s quite simple,” Ms. Leavitt said Monday. “Obey the law, respect the law, and don’t obstruct federal immigration officials and law enforcement officials when they are simply trying to remove public safety threats from our nation’s communities.”

The executive orders were signed a day before Mr. Trump celebrates the 100th day of his second term. The White House has scheduled a week of events promoting his actions so far, beginning with his immigration crackdown.

The White House lawn was lined Monday morning with mug shot-style posters of undocumented migrants who were arrested and accused of committing crimes.

In his first term, Mr. Trump targeted so-called sanctuary cities by threatening to withhold federal funding from mayors and governors who did not comply with his anti-immigration agenda. The administration has ramped up pressure on the jurisdictions just three months into Mr. Trump’s second term, using bellicose language to describe the tension with Democratic leaders.

Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, said Democratic governors and mayors were waging a “war” against federal law enforcement.

“They don’t recognize the supremacy of federal law enforcement to protect the lives and livelihoods of American citizens against a foreign nation,” Mr. Miller said.

Mr. Miller said those Democratic-led cities were allowing “illegal aliens to go free and rape and murder.”

Even before Mr. Trump signed the new executive orders on Monday, the Department of Homeland Security said it was reviewing billions of dollars in grants for cities and states to make sure recipients complied with Mr. Trump’s priorities on immigration enforcement and other domestic policies.

For Mr. Trump’s immigration advisers, the sanctuary city policies are one of the primary hurdles standing in their way of making good on Mr. Trump’s campaign pledge to record the most deportations in U.S. history. The label of “sanctuary jurisdiction” applies broadly to cities and counties that block their local jails from cooperating with federal immigration officials.

The federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, prefers to pick up undocumented immigrants from local jails, rather than from their homes, workplaces or out in public. In order to do so, it needs collaboration from local officials, like county sheriffs. In some cities and counties, this collaboration is outright blocked or severely limited.

At a morning news conference, Tom Homan, the Trump administration’s border czar, said the administration had carried out 139,000 deportations. That figure lags behind the pace of the final year of the Biden administration, which seemed to annoy Mr. Homan.

He said the number would be higher but, because border crossings had fallen so significantly, there were fewer people to turn back.

“Am I happy with that? The numbers are good,” he said, adding: “I read the media, ‘Oh, ICE deportations are behind Biden administration.’ Well, why? Because they counted border removals.”

Mr. Homan said the administration would, as of Tuesday, begin to enforce its plan to make undocumented immigrants ages 14 and older register and provide their fingerprints to the U.S. government or potentially face criminal prosecution.



Source link

Student Debt Collections Restart on May 5. Here’s What to Know.

0


After a five-year reprieve, the Trump administration will restart forced collections on federal student loans in default, which could include garnishing a portion of borrowers’ paychecks.

With collections in place, the last piece of the student loan machinery has been turned back on, officially ending pandemic-era relief, which began when President Trump paused federal student loan payments in March 2020.

The Biden administration extended the freeze several times, and payments resumed only in October 2023. But the rules were relaxed for the first year of repayment, and borrowers weren’t penalized for slipping behind until last fall.

Now that those penalties have begun to appear, borrowers who fell behind are beginning to see their credit scores plunge, including more than five million borrowers in default and many millions more projected to be on the precipice.

At the same time, the Biden-era repayment program known as SAVE — which ties a borrower’s loan payments to income and household size — has been frozen since August, with its eight million enrollees’ payments on hold. That plan is stuck in legal limbo, an evolving situation that threatens to upend the income-driven repayment plans that came before it.

Here’s where things stand for borrowers.

If you log in to your account on the federal website, StudentAid.gov, you’ll find your dashboard with details on how much you owe and the status of your loans — whether they are in repayment, for example, or default. If it’s the latter, you may also see a warning at the top.

Make sure your contact information is up to date both there and with your loan servicer, which is the company the government hired to administer your loans.

The Education Department said it will begin forced collections on loans in default on May 5, which means any tax refunds and other federal payments can be withheld and applied toward your debt. (Seizures from recurring payments, like Social Security benefits, won’t start until early June.) This summer, the government said, it will send out required notices that pave the way for garnishing a portion of borrowers’ paychecks.

If you are among the five million borrowers in default, or those with loans 270 days or more overdue, you should expect to receive an email from the Federal Student Aid office in the next couple of weeks, urging you to get in touch with its Default Resolution Group. That unit can help get your loan situation sorted.

There are serious consequences if the loans remain in default, which means the balance becomes immediately due. The government can grab your entire tax refund (as long as it doesn’t exceed your debt amount) and up to 15 percent of monthly Social Security retirement and disability benefits and your paycheck. (The Treasury Offset program has a more comprehensive list of what’s eligible and what’s off limits.)

Besides collections, the default will damage your credit standing, which can make it more difficult to qualify for an apartment rental or impossible to obtain new loans.

You can pay the loan in full, but that’s not an option for most people.

More feasible alternatives include consolidating the defaulted loans or rehabilitating the loan, which requires making nine out of 10 consecutive “reasonable” payments, determined by loan holders using a formula.

It’s usually easiest to consolidate the defaulted loan (as long as you have more than one loan) into one federal Direct Consolidation Loan, which pays off the old ones.

But there are drawbacks, especially for borrowers in income-driven repayment plans (which forgive any remaining debt after a period, generally 20 years, of payments tied to your income and household size). After consolidation, you lose any credit earned toward loan forgiveness.

Income-driven repayment plans, a decades-old safety net that ties the size of your monthly loan payments to your income level, is often a go-to option in times of financial distress.

But there are fewer income-driven options at the moment: The entire landscape was shaken up after two groups of Republican-led states challenged the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan, the more affordable income-driven repayment plan introduced by President Biden. Given the high cost of the program, the states argued that Mr. Biden had overstepped his authority, and the courts temporarily froze SAVE while the merits of the case are decided.

Remaining programs include:

  • The Pay as You Earn (PAYE) and Income-Based Repayment (I.B.R.) plans, where monthly payments are 10 percent of discretionary income for 20 years, at which time any remaining balance is forgiven* (or after 25 years for graduate borrowers in I.B.R.).

  • The Income-Contingent Repayment (I.C.R.), a more expensive plan, where payments are 20 percent of discretionary income for 25 years, after which any remaining debt is wiped away.* (I.C.R. is the only income-driven plan available to federal parent PLUS loan borrowers.)

(*At the moment, loan forgiveness is on hold for all income-driven repayment plans with the exception of I.B.R. For more explanation on the complicated status of all income-driven plans right now, see the next question.)

Beyond the income-driven programs, there are repayment plans that can lower your monthly obligation: graduated repayment, where payments start lower and rise over time, and extended repayment, which lowers the monthly payment by lengthening the loan term.

The Education Department’s Loan Simulator can help borrowers evaluate and compare which type of repayment plan would work best for their situation.

Some have, at least temporarily.

A February court order upheld the temporary pause on the SAVE plan, but also expanded it by calling into question a longstanding feature of income-driven plans: loan forgiveness, which usually occurs after at least two decades of payments.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit said the Education Department lacked the explicit authority to forgive loans as part of the Income-Contingent Repayment plans, a significant departure from how the statute governing the plan had been interpreted for about 30 years.

The litigation, which is ongoing, prompted the administration to pause forgiveness on the PAYE and I.C.R. plans since, like SAVE, they were created by the Education Department.

Borrowers in the I.B.R. plan, which Congress enacted, can continue to have their loans forgiven. (Payments on PAYE, SAVE and I.C.R. are counted toward I.B.R. plan forgiveness if the borrower enrolls in the I.B.R. program.)

Several other newer rules were changed or clarified, too. Separately, a married borrower in an income-driven plan who files a separate income tax return from their spouse will not have to include the spouse’s income in the calculation determining monthly payments, experts said, but the spouse can be included in family size.

Starting in January, borrowers in income-driven repayment plans were able to see their progress toward loan forgiveness on their StudentAid.gov dashboard. But with the appellate court’s order temporarily banning the SAVE plan and parts of other income-driven plans, the Education Department said it had removed the payment counter for the time being.

Borrower advocates say it is still possible to find the counter once you’re logged in, however, and they suggest taking screenshots.

“This is important so that they know where they stand and how much longer they should expect to have student loan bills,” said Abby Shafroth, director of the National Consumer Law Center’s Student Loan Borrower Assistance Project, “and so they have evidence of their credit toward forgiveness in case there is an effort to quietly roll it back.”

The Education Department said it had not processed applications for enrollment in any income-driven repayment plans since August, but it is working with federal student loan servicers and expects processing to begin again in May.

Still, it could take a while, depending on your situation: Roughly 1.9 million applicants are in the queue.

Since income-driven plans base payments on earnings and family size, participants have been required to update — or recertify — their income each year (or face negative consequences).

If you were due to recertify on or after Feb. 21, 2025, your recertification date has been extended one year. (The Federal Student Aid office’s website has more specifics.)

The department said that recertification would eventually be automated, and that it would release more information this week.

Borrowers can temporarily pause payments through deferments or forbearance. Review the terms carefully, because these programs have different eligibility requirements and consequences, largely because of the way interest is treated.

Simply consolidating your loans can also lower your monthly payments by extending the repayment period, but there are drawbacks. You may have a higher interest rate on all of your debt and end up paying more overall.

The Saving on a Valuable Education plan is still winding its way through the courts, and enrollees have been in limbo since last summer. Their accounts are in forbearance, which in this case means payments are on hold and interest is not accruing.

The Public Service Loan Forgiveness program is still open to government and nonprofit employees such as public schoolteachers, librarians and public defenders. After 120 qualifying payments are made, any remaining balance is wiped out. But most borrowers need to be enrolled in an income-driven repayment plan to be eligible for loan cancellation.

Borrowers in SAVE are currently in an interest-free forbearance — and they cannot earn payment credits toward forgiveness. But the other available income-driven plans — I.B.R., I.C.R. and PAYE — are still compatible with Public Service Loan Forgiveness.

You have a couple of options. You can switch to one of the other income-driven repayment plans, which will allow you to earn credit toward forgiveness.

Alternatively, you can ride out the SAVE forbearance and use what’s called a “buy back” to get credit for those months once you have completed 120 months of eligible employment, said Betsy Mayotte, president of the Institute of Student Loan Advisors, a group that provides free guidance to borrowers.

Using the buy back option, borrowers later make payments that are at least equal to what they would have owed under an eligible income-driven plan for the time they were paused in forbearance. (Be sure to document and keep copies or snapshots of everything, including your work history with your eligible employer as well as any qualifying payments and recertification applications.)

President Trump instructed Education Secretary Linda McMahon to begin to shut down the agency, but he cannot do so without congressional approval. He also announced that the student loan portfolio would move to the Small Business Administration, a change that would also require approval. But as my colleague Stacy Cowley reported, Congress has shown no interest in that idea.

For now, the loan portfolio remains at the Education Department.

You can try the Institute of Student Loan Advisors, a group that provides free guidance to borrowers. The Student Debt Crisis Center has a resource center and holds workshops, and some states, like New York, may offer services to assist borrowers.

If you’re having trouble getting the help you need with your servicer, some states have student loan ombudsman offices that can help.

The Federal Student Aid office also has a list of frequently asked questions on its website.



Source link

G.M. Withdraws Profit Forecast as Trump Tariffs Take a Toll

0


General Motors is abandoning a previous forecast for solid profit growth this year as a result of the uncertainty created by President Trump’s trade policies, the automaker said on Tuesday.

The Trump administration imposed a 25 percent tariffs on imported cars this month and has said it will impose a 25 percent duty on imported parts on Saturday. About half the cars that G.M. sells in the United States in a typical year are made abroad, mostly in Canada and Mexico.

“We are not going to give any more forward guidance on tariffs until we have more clarity,” the company’s chief financial officer, Paul Jacobson, said in a conference call with reporters. “We don’t want to put out a number from the company that is a guess amidst what the administration might do.”

He added that G.M. believed the impact of Mr. Trump’s tariffs “could be material,” meaning they could have a substantial effect on the company’s earnings this year.

G.M. also said on Tuesday that it made $2.8 billion in the first quarter, a decline of 7 percent from a year earlier. The company was hurt by a 14 percent drop in earnings before interest and taxes in North America, where it generates almost all of its profit. Its businesses that serve the rest of the world recorded small profits.

The company previously said it expected to make between $11.2 billion and $12.5 billion in net income for 2025, roughly double the $6 billion it made last year.

“The prior guidance cannot be relied upon,” Mr. Jacobson said.

In addition to the 25 percent tariffs on imported cars, the Trump administration has raised tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, driving up the costs of metals widely used in cars. Mr. Trump has also substantially raised tariffs on China and imposed hefty tariffs on many other countries that he later reduced to 10 percent for 90 days.

G.M. has had “productive discussions” with the Trump administration on tariffs, Mr. Jacobson said, but he declined to elaborate. “I don’t want to be viewed as trying to negotiate in public,” he said. “We look forward to getting more clarity around the tariff situation for the auto industry.”

The tariffs had a minimal impact on the company’s financial performance in the first quarter because they didn’t go into effect until April 3, Mr. Jacobson said. “The fundamentals of our business are strong,” he said.

G.M. previously said it would increase pickup truck production at a plant near Fort Wayne, Ind., a move that would allow it to reduce truck imports somewhat from Canada and Mexico.



Source link

Madrid Open: Play cancelled for day due to power outage in large parts of Spain and Portugal | Tennis News

0


Britain’s Jacob Fearnley was forced off court as Monday’s play was cancelled for day at the Madrid Open due to a nationwide power outage.

The third-round tie between Fearnley and Grigor Dimitrov had reached a critical stage, Fearnley breaking the 15th seed’s serve to stay in the match, when a loss of power in the local area affected scoreboards and the camera above the court.

The positioning of the camera when it lost power meant the match could not continue even with line judges, as it was stuck in the eyeline of the players.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Highlights of the Madrid Open match between Grigor Dimitrov and Jacob Fearnley before it was suspended due to the power outage

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Watch the moment the power outage hit Coco Gauff’s post-match interview

Play was stopped at 12.34pm local time and – after remaining on court for some time – the pair were eventually taken inside to wait for the issue to be rectified.

Electronic line calling systems were also affected by the power cut, the ATP said, while spectators shared pictures of dark hallways at the Manzanares Park Tennis Centre.

Gigi Salmon, speaking on Sky Sports News, said: “Everyone is in darkness. I walked past the player restaurant and the players are eating by candlelight so that they can actually see what they’re eating.”

Play suspended at Madrid Open
Image:
Play was suspended at the Madrid Open when Dimitrov was leading Fearnley 6-4 5-4

The tournament later cancelled play for the day, explaining on social media site X: “For reasons beyond the control of the organisation and in order to guarantee general safety, the nationwide power-cut experienced in Spain on Monday April 28 has forced the cancellation of both the day and night sessions at the Mutua Madrid Open.”

Spanish power grid operator Red Electrica said it could take up to 10 hours to restore power – as airports and public transport services have been affected in both countries.

“We are beginning to recover power in the north and south of the peninsula, which is key to gradually meeting the electricity supply,” said Red Electrica via X.

“This process involves the gradual energisation of the transmission grid as the generating units are connected. We continue working to restore power.”

Spectators roam inside the Madrid Open tennis tournament venue during a general blackout in Madrid, Monday, April 28, 2025. (AP Photo/Manu Fernandez)
Image:
Spectators were stuck in dark hallways at the Manzanares Park Tennis Centre

Spectators roam inside the Madrid Open tennis tournament venue during a general blackout in Madrid, Monday, April 28, 2025. (AP Photo/Manu Fernandez)
Image:
The blackout caused chaos

Parts of the Madrid underground were evacuated and traffic lights in the city stopped working while El Mundo reported thousands of passengers had to be evacuated after the outage left the metro service in Barcelona without power.

National media reports in Spain reported Sevilla and Valencia were also hit by the outage and telephone lines were also down across the country, while parliament in Madrid and metro stations across the country in the dark.

In Portugal, a country of some 10.6 million people, the outage hit the capital, Lisbon, and surrounding areas, as well as northern and southern parts of the country. Parts of France were also affected, according to further reports.

Red Electrica announced on Tuesday morning that Spain had recovered more than 99 per cent of its power, with tournament organisers confirming that play would resume as scheduled.

The statement said: “Power supply has been restored at the Caja Mágica. To ensure the proper functioning of the entire facility, gates will open at 11:00 AM, and play will begin at 12:00 PM, as originally scheduled.”

Watch the ATP and WTA Tours, as well as the US Open in New York, live on Sky Sports in 2025 or stream with NOW and the Sky Sports app, giving Sky Sports customers access to over 50 per cent more live sport this year at no extra cost. Find out more here.



Source link

Pogba in the Baller League!? KSI teases possible transfer…

0




KSI teases Baller League fans by revealing he has been in talks with Paul Pogba over a transfer!



Source link

Trump Administration Looks to Take Steps to Ease Pain From Car Tariffs

0


The Trump administration said it plans to announce measures as early as Tuesday to ease the impact of tariffs on imported cars and car parts to give automakers more time to relocate production to the United States.

Tariffs of 25 percent on imported vehicles and on auto parts will remain in place. But the tariffs will be modified so that they are not “stacked” with other tariffs, for example on steel and aluminum, a White House spokesman said. Automakers will not have to pay tariffs on those metals, widely used in automobiles, on top of the tariffs on cars and parts.

In addition, automakers will be reimbursed for some of the cost of tariffs on imported components. The reimbursement will amount to up to 3.75 percent of the value of a new car in the first year, but will be phased out over two years, the spokesman confirmed.

A 25 percent tariff on imported cars took effect April 3. On Saturday, the tariffs are set to be extended to include imported parts.

“President Trump is building an important partnership with both the domestic automakers and our great American workers,” Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, said in a statement. “This deal is a major victory for the president’s trade policy by rewarding companies who manufacture domestically, while providing runway to manufacturers who have expressed their commitment to invest in America and expand their domestic manufacturing.”

But even with these changes, there will still be substantial tariffs on imported cars and auto parts, which will raise prices for new and used cars by thousands of dollars and increase the cost of repairs and insurance premiums.

The modification to the tariffs was reported earlier by The Wall Street Journal. Mr. Lutnick helped automakers secure a major exemption from tariffs in March and has taken on a role advocating relief for some industries hit by the levies.

Automakers welcomed the change. “We believe the president’s leadership is helping level the playing field for companies like G.M. and allowing us to invest even more in the U.S. economy,” Mary T. Barra, the chief executive of General Motors, said in a statement on Monday. “We appreciate the productive conversations with the president and his administration and look forward to continuing to work together.”



Source link