Home Blog Page 369

German Darts Grand Prix draw and results: Luke Littler, Michael van Gerwen and Gerwyn Price play over Easter | Darts News

0


Luke Littler, Michael van Gerwen and Gerwyn Price are among the players involved in the German Darts Grand Prix over the Easter weekend as the fourth European Tour event of 2025 takes place.

As Price, Van Gerwen and reigning world champion Littler are among the 16 seeds, they will enter at the second-round stage on Easter Sunday, after the tournament gets going on Saturday with 16 games.

World No 1 Luke Humphries won the Munich event in 2024, trouncing Van Gerwen 8-1 in the final to claim the title for a second time in three years, but has opted out this time around, along with Nathan Aspinall and Dimitri Van den Bergh.

Michael van Gerwen, PDC Premier League Cardiff 2025
Image:
Michael van Gerwen is a three-time winner of the German Darts Grand Prix

The tournament concludes on Easter Monday with the third round, quarter-finals, semi-finals and final.

As the top two seeds, Littler and Van Gerwen could meet in the final, less than a week before they square off in the quarter-finals on Night 12 of Premier League Darts in Liverpool, live on Sky Sports.

The German Darts Grand Prix is played in leg format with every round up to and including the quarter-finals best of 11 ahead of the best-of-13 semis and best-of-15 final.

There is an overall prize pot of £175,000 with the winner to earn £30,000.

So far on the European Tour this season, Littler retained the Belgian Darts Open, Aspinall won the European Darts Trophy and Stephen Bunting clinched the International Darts Open.

German Darts Grand Prix draw

Round one (Saturday April 19)

Afternoon session (from 1200 BST)

  • Ryan Joyce vs Andras Borbely
  • Ritchie Edhouse vs Mickey Mansell
  • Madars Razma vs Robert Grundy
  • Luke Woodhouse vs Cam Crabtree
  • Daryl Gurney vs Niels Zonneveld
  • Wessel Nijman vs Scott Williams
  • Kim Huybrechts vs Finn Behrens
  • Cameron Menzies vs Kevin Doets

Evening session (from 1800 BST)

  • Ricardo Pietreczko vs Adam Paxton
  • Gian van Veen vs Rene Eidams
  • Mensur Suljovic vs Krzysztof Ratajski
  • Raymond van Barneveld vs Michael Rosenauer
  • Jermaine Wattimena vs Michael Unterbuchner
  • Dirk van Duijvenbode vs Andy Boulton
  • Martin Schindler vs Mario Vandenbogaerde
  • Mike De Decker vs Johan Engstrom

Round two (Sunday April 20)

Afternoon session (from 1200 BST)

  • Danny Noppert vs Razma/Grundy
  • Damon Heta vs Joyce/Borbely
  • Andrew Gilding vs Van Veen/Eidams
  • Ryan Searle vs Menzies/Doets
  • Josh Rock vs Nijman/Williams
  • Rob Cross vs Pietreczko/Paxton
  • Michael Smith vs Suljovic/Ratajski
  • Joe Cullen vs Edhouse/Mansell

Evening session (from 1800 BST)

  • James Wade vs Gurney/Zonneveld
  • Gerwyn Price vs Van Barneveld/Rosenauer
  • Dave Chisnall vs Van Duijvenbode/Boulton
  • Michael van Gerwen vs Huybrechts/Behrens
  • Luke Littler vs Woodhouse/Crabtree
  • Peter Wright vs De Decker/Engstrom
  • Jonny Clayton vs Schindler/Vandenbogaerde
  • Ross Smith vs Wattimena/Unterbuchner

Monday April 21

Afternoon session (from 1200 BST)

Evening session (from 1800 BST)

  • Quarter-finals
  • Semi-finals
  • Final



Source link

Meta on Trial + Is A.I. a ‘Normal’ Technology? + HatGPT

0



“The market for social networks, or even what Meta is, is very different now than it was even a couple of years ago.”



Source link

Ben Whittaker’s new trainer Andy Lee ahead of Liam Cameron rematch: ‘I’m putting my reputation on the line too’ | Boxing News

0


Ben Whittaker has made changes ahead of his rematch with Liam Cameron.

After an extraordinary fall, that saw both fighters tumble out of the ring, their first fight ended in a contentious technical decision draw.

They will rematch on Sunday in Birmingham, live on Sky Sports, and Whittaker will have a new trainer in his corner.

Former WBO middleweight world champion and well-regarded professional coach Andy Lee is now working with the Olympic silver medallist.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Speaking on Toe2Toe, Matthew Macklin, Barry Jones and Wayne Elcock discuss how Ben Whittaker might approach his rematch with Liam Cameron.

“I just saw a fighter who is immensely talented, who needs guidance, structure,” Lee told Sky Sports. “Behind all the persona is a very humble, honest, determined young man.

“A talent like Ben needs mentoring. It needs channelling, it needs guiding and that’s why I thought it would be a travesty to see such a fighter like this lose or not reach his potential because of lack of the right coaching.”

It will be an intensely pressurised occasion, headlining at the bp pulse LIVE arena in a high-stakes rematch, especially for a first fight in a new trainer-boxer partnership.

“Trust and relationships are built over time. We don’t have that luxury of time,” Lee said. “But a lot of talking is done during the training camp.

“You have to communicate, know what makes them tick and how they think.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Ben Whittaker says he will pass the microphone to Liam Cameron once he wins their fight. The Gloves Are Off is available to watch now in full.

He added of Whittaker: “I don’t see any ceiling on how good he is. I think he’s potentially a world champion. I don’t want to go over the top but from what I’m seeing in the gym, so exciting to watch, such a pleasure to watch and he can do pretty much anything he wants to in the sport.

“But you have to go through the steps and earn it. It’s not given just because you’re talented. You have to work for it and earn it.”

Whittaker, early in his professional career, had previously tended to make headlines with his often spectacular showboating.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Ben Whittaker jokingly threatened Liam Cameron with an egg during ‘Gloves Are Off’ – but you’ll have to tune in to see if the two shook hands!

He was though heavily criticised after the draw with Cameron. “It’s the nature of the world we live in today,” Lee said, “but it’s a good lesson for him because he’s had those incredible highs of going viral with all the showboating clips and now he’s had the reverse of that with criticisms from every corner of the world.

“It’s probably a great lesson for him as a fighter but also as a human being to take everything with a pinch of salt, the highs and the lows, the praise and the criticism.

“One day you’re the hero and the next day you’re the villain.”

It’s a must-win fight for Whittaker. But going into the Cameron rematch, Lee believes his own reputation is at risk.

“We’re both in it together anyway. My reputation and his reputation are both on the line. We’re both working hard to win,” he said.

“I’ll put that all on the line for Ben. I back him all the way.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Ben Whittaker says he is ‘counting down the weeks’ to his second fight against Liam Cameron, ready to show him what he can do.

Why Lee?

It was Andy Lee who initially reached out to Whittaker after watching the first fight with Cameron.

“I always wanted a change. I knew it was going to come,” Whittaker told Sky Sports. “I was always going to change but it was just when.”

The appeal of Lee as his trainer was clear to Whittaker. “He’s a person I’ve always looked up to in boxing. He’s done what I want to achieve, he’s a world champion,” he said.

“He’s produced champions himself, he’s a champion himself.”

Whittaker has moved his training camp to Dublin to work with Lee.

“You cut the distractions out and it’s just about having fun and working while doing it,” he said.

“I’m loving every minute of it, I’m learning and we’re a good combination.”

Watch the Ben Whittaker vs Liam Cameron rematch on Sunday live on Sky Sports.



Source link

The Verdict: Making sense of Man Utd's unbelievable comeback!

0




Adam Bate and Ben Ransom react to Manchester United’s thrilling 5-4 win against Lyon in the Europa League at Old Trafford.



Source link

Amorim: All the frustration and bad times are worth it for moments like this!

0




Manchester United manager Ruben Amorim reacted to his team’s late comeback win against Lyon in the Europa League, saying ‘anything can happen in this stadium’.



Source link

'A disgrace!' | Boyd's furious reaction to Rangers 'stonewall penalty' appeal

0




Kris Boyd reacts to Rangers being denied a penalty in their Europa League clash with Athletic Club when Cyriel Dessers was taken down in the box by Dani Vivian and left with a ripped shirt.



Source link

U.S. Is Withdrawing Hundreds of Troops From Syria

0



The end of the Assad era has reduced some threats, but the Islamic State has shown renewed strength in the country.



Source link

2 Protesters at Marjorie Taylor Greene Town Hall Are Subdued With Stun Guns

0


A town hall for Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia outside of Atlanta on Tuesday quickly deteriorated into chaos, as police officers forcibly removed several protesters.

Ms. Greene, a Republican firebrand and loyal ally of President Trump, had barely reached the podium to speak when a man in the crowd at the Acworth Community Center stood up and started yelling, booing and jeering at her. As her supporters stood and clapped, several police officers grabbed the man, later identified by the police as Andrew Russell Nelms of Atlanta, and dragged him out of the room.

“I can’t breathe!” Mr. Nelms shouted, interjecting with expletives as he was told to put his arms behind his back. The police then used a stun gun on him twice.

Back inside the room, Ms. Greene was unfazed as she greeted attendees at the event, in Acworth, Ga., northwest of Atlanta. She thanked the officers, drawing applause from the crowd of about 150 people.

“If you want to shout and chant, we will have you removed just like that man was thrown out,” she said. “We will not tolerate it!”

Minutes later, as Ms. Greene started to play a video of former President Barack Obama discussing the national debt, police forcibly removed and used a stun gun on a second man, identified later as Johnny Keith Williams of Dallas, Ga., who had stood up and started to heckle.

Over the next hour, as Ms. Greene trumpeted the efforts of the Department of Government Efficiency to shrink the government and played clips of herself railing against witnesses in committee hearings, police officers escorted at least six people from the room, according to a spokesman for the Acworth Police Department. Three people, including the two who were subdued with stun guns, were arrested.

In between disruptions at the event, Ms. Greene applauded the Trump administration’s deportation efforts and praised Congress for passing the Laken Riley Act, a measure that requires the detention of undocumented immigrants accused of certain crimes. Ms. Greene crowed about the DOGE team’s push to shutter the U.S. Agency for International Development. Instead of taking questions directly from the audience, she read and answered prescreened questions from a slide deck.

“Why is M.T.G. supporting Musk and DOGE and the slashing of Medicaid, Social Security offices, libraries and more?” read one question from a person identified only as Sarah. “This is outrageous.”

“Well, Sarah, unfortunately, you’re being brainwashed by the news that you’re watching,” Ms. Greene replied, to whoops and cheers from the crowd.

Mike Binns, a constituent who was escorted from the room after he yelled at Ms. Greene, said the event felt more like a “political rally” than a town hall.

Outside, several hundred protesters lined the street, waving signs that bore phrases such as “Pro America, Anti Trump” and “Resist!”

Asked if she thought using stun guns on protesters at the event was an appropriate response, Ms. Greene reiterated her praise for the law enforcement officials.

“You know who was out of line? The protesters,” Ms. Greene said. “There was a place designated outside for the protesters because we support their First Amendment rights.”

Sean Keenan contributed reporting.



Source link

A Reporter on Steak Fries: Tasty Spud or Dud?

0


Times Insider explains who we are and what we do and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together.

At first, I had nothing more than a rant in mind. It was January, and I had been to two restaurants in the span of a single week that had served me steak fries, first alongside some lamb chops, the second time next to a burger. On both occasions I had felt the instant pang of disappointment, followed by an unhappy sort of wonderment.

Doesn’t everyone hate these things?

Thick, often undercooked and typically without crunch, they hardly seem to qualify as a fry. But I was genuinely curious. I wanted to know what was going on in the mind of the chef who considered steak fries a smart addition to any menu.

This was a perfectly natural sort of inquiry for me because I am the chief French fry correspondent at The New York Times. That was a joke. I write features for the Business desk, and I have written about restaurants on a few occasions. Most recently, I went long on the surprisingly fraught demise of Red Lobster. But one of the pleasures of working at this newspaper is that it is filled with editors on many different desks who will take a pitch from anyone.

In this case, that editor was Brian Gallagher, on the Food desk. “Any interest in a piece about the mysterious persistence of steak fries?” I asked in an email. “I like this!” he wrote back.

My first step was to call David Burke, owner of Park Ave Kitchen in Manhattan, the second of the steak fry-offering restaurants I had visited. He sounded every bit as flummoxed as me. This was the doing of his chef, William Lustberg, he explained.

Soon, Mr. Lustberg joined our call, and then he said something surprising. He had added steak fries to the menu on purpose. Nostalgia was part of it; the steak fry heyday, as far as anyone can tell, had been in the late 1970s and early ’80s, and Mr. Lustberg figured that they were so out of favor now that they were due for a comeback. You should try our Midtown hipster fries, he said, which are topped with Camembert cheese and maple-soaked bacon.

My plan, which was simply to fulminate about steak fries — I imagined a tone poem, filled with rage and starch — was over. Here was a chef who had found redeeming features in steak fries, and was showcasing them in a novel way. This left open the possibility that he wasn’t alone. Maybe my article should be about the rum band of chefs who were proud to serve the world’s least loved French fry.

Before going further, I had to determine whether my distaste for steak fries was a personal quirk or a widely shared opinion. So I called Sysco, the Houston-based food giant, which sells to restaurants, hospitals and just about everywhere else. I found myself on a Zoom call with Neil Doherty, the company’s senior director of global culinary strategy. Sysco offers a steak fry, he said, and it is either dead last or close to it on sales ranking lists in the United States. It has a following among people who want the taste of potato rather than crispy coating.

“That’s why steak fries are still big in the U.K. and Ireland,” said Mr. Doherty, “especially in bars and in fish-and-chip land.”

Get in touch with someone at Red Robin, he suggested, referring to a burger chain of nearly 500 restaurants that has long put steak fries at the forefront of its menu.

About a week later, I took a bus from Manhattan to Secaucus, N.J., and met Andrew Birkbeck, a Red Robin culinary product developer, who’d flown in from the company’s headquarters in Greenwood Village, Colo. In a test kitchen there, he said, he and two other recipe developers spend their days in culinary mad scientist mode, whipping up new menu items, which include different sauces for steak fries.

He fried up a batch and we sat at a table dunking them into the sauces. The appeal was instantly, blazingly clear. Simply putting salt and ketchup on steak fries is to miss their point. They are designed to carry big, bold flavors.

Three days after this tasting my brain was still occasionally firing neurons bearing a message. “Go back to Red Robin,” it said. “Eat steak fries.”

The next week I returned to Park Ave Kitchen and tried Chef Lustberg’s so-called hipster fries. Obviously the name is a terrible idea, but the pile of ingredients atop the dish, in tandem with the fries, proved irresistible.

I am still convinced that the undercooked steak fry, with a bit of salt and ketchup, is a disaster. But that is not the fault of the steak fries. It’s the fault of chefs.

When my article was published, steak fry fans showed up by the dozens in the comments section and in my inbox. One contested the very premise of my story.

“This article must be a hoax,” wrote someone identified as Corey, who then helpfully hinted at a solid idea for a follow-up article. “Seasoned curly fries are an abomination.”



Source link

A U.S.-China Trade War With Students and Tourists as Potential Pawns

0


China has warned its people to think twice before visiting the United States, citing trade tensions. It also told its students to be careful about studying there and accused two American universities of hacking. And it has vowed to cut down on the number of Hollywood films that can be shown in China.

The trade war between the United States and China is already eroding far more than just economic ties. The rapid expansion of the battlefield, from trade to culture and education, underscores how fragile the relationship between the United States and China has become.

The United States, for its part, has revoked some Chinese student and scholar visas, as part of a broader targeting of international students by the Trump administration. While the moves were not directly related to the trade dispute, some conservatives have suggested linking them: Donald Trump Jr., the president’s son, posted online last week that it was a “great idea” to expel all Chinese students as retaliation for China hitting back with its own tariffs.

For decades, the flow of students, travelers, artists and businesspeople between the countries served as a steadying force, even when political or economic tensions flared. But as relations have deteriorated in recent years, both countries have started to turn those ties into bargaining chips, too.

“This is an emotional reaction, not a rational one,” said Shen Dingli, a Shanghai-based international relations scholar. “Rationally, the more tense China-U.S. trade relations become, the more both sides need to keep an overall balance, to avoid a full-on conflict.”

Until recently, both the United States and China had been trying to rehabilitate those softer exchanges, perhaps because they had gotten a glimpse of how dangerous their absence could be.

During Mr. Trump’s first term and the early years of President Joseph R. Biden’s, relations plunged to their lowest point in decades, inflamed by the coronavirus pandemic, disputes over Taiwan and an alleged spy balloon. At the same time, the yearslong closure of China’s borders during the pandemic led to a freeze of interpersonal exchanges.

When Mr. Xi and Mr. Biden finally met in person in 2023 to try and thaw the relationship, they pledged to restore some of those exchanges, as a way to shore up ties. Mr. Xi said he would invite more American students to China. American officials promised that they welcomed Chinese students.

Economic and political considerations were always inextricable from these détentes. Amid a lackluster economy, China last year allowed the highest number of foreign movies to be imported since 2019; official media noted that imported films would improve box office sales. American musicians who performed in China brought tourism to their host cities. China was eager to project itself as open as it tried to woo back foreign investors.

In the United States, Chinese students — who make up one-quarter of international students there — are a vital source of funding for American universities. In 2023, they contributed about $14.3 billion to the American economy, according to U.S. government data.

Still, both sides vaunted the ties as worthwhile in their own right. “The China-U.S. relationship has experienced ups and downs,” an article in Chinese state media said, “but China’s steadfast commitment to promoting friendly exchanges between the peoples of China and the U.S. has remained unchanged.”

Now, those promises are fading.

To retaliate for American tariffs, China has announced levies of its own, export controls, bans on certain American companies doing business in China — and the import of fewer Hollywood movies.

The government made clear that it expected — and might encourage — the economic frostiness to spill over to attitudes toward the United States in general. The tariffs would “inevitably reduce how favorably Chinese audiences view American films,” the national film administration said.

A day earlier, China’s culture and tourism ministry had warned travelers to “fully assess the risks” of visiting the United States, given the “deterioration of Sino-U.S. economic and trade relations.”

A separate warning from the education ministry did not mention the trade war, instead focusing on legislation passed in Ohio targeting academic collaborations with China. But it was published the same day as the tourism warning, and was the first alert the ministry had issued to Chinese students going abroad since 2021.

On Tuesday, Chinese state media separately accused the University of California and Virginia Tech of taking part in cyberattacks on the Asian Winter Games, which China hosted earlier this year. (The authorities also said they had added three people supposedly affiliated with the U.S. National Security Agency to a wanted list. Hashtags encouraging people to report clues about American spies trended on social media.)

The universities and the American Embassy in Beijing did not immediately comment.

Wang Li, a study abroad consultant in Beijing, said that she had been inundated by messages from parents and students in the last week. She hosted a livestream with 1,800 viewers to discuss the education ministry’s warning on Monday, where she addressed questions about whether people could still apply for visas or whether it was advisable to do so.

“This was all very sudden,” Ms. Wang said in an interview, referring to both the ministry’s warning and the American government’s visa revocations of many international students, including from China. “So it has caused panic.”

On Chinese social media, some users have said they were debating whether to cancel trips to the United States over the upcoming five-day May Day holiday. They cited fears of being turned away at the border and of general animosity toward China.

Da Wei, a professor of international relations at Tsinghua University in Beijing, said the travel and study notices were a warning shot to Washington from the Chinese government. He noted that they were not outright bans but also acknowledged that the countries were on the route to escalation, and that China was signaling that it could go further.

“Once you lose control, everything could happen, and it could be dangerous,” he said. “So I think the logic behind the Chinese side’s actions is kind of warning that you should not expand it to other areas.”

But Professor Da also noted that there were real reasons for Chinese students to worry about going to the United States. Government officials under both Democratic and Republican administrations have accused Chinese scholars of being spies. Mr. Da said that he himself has been stopped for extended questioning at the U.S. border multiple times.

Florida has restricted public universities from hiring Chinese citizens. A bill in the House of Representatives would bar any Chinese nationals from studying in the United States, though it is unlikely to pass.

Republican lawmakers have also demanded that several universities provide information on the finances and research of their Chinese students.

Ms. Wang, the study abroad consultant, said the tensions had scared off even people who were most eager to build connections with the United States.

“Many students, even if they look up to the freedom, tolerance and rich academic resources of the United States, feel they have to change directions,” she said.

On her livestream, she urged her viewers to keep their options open by also applying to Australian or European universities as backup.

“Leave yourself a safety net, OK?” she said.

Siyi Zhao contributed research.



Source link